The Supreme Court’s tariff ruling: Letters – Latest News
The Issue: The Supreme Court’s 6-3 choice to strike down some of President Trump’s claimed tariff powers.
The Supreme Court’s tariff ruling will trigger a lot harm to our nation (“President rips ‘disloyal’ justices,” Feb. 21).
We should pay the curiosity on our national debt, which is now at $38 trillion.
President Trump’s tariffs had been serving to by raising the associated fee of foreign-made items, making American merchandise more aggressive.
Now that financial issue is gone.
Sure, Trump was caustic and gruff in negotiating these tariffs, however that’s what was required to perform the purpose, which earlier presidents didn’t do.
Neil Kay
Sunrise, Fla.
It’s unlucky that Trump’s conduct towards the Supreme Court was demeaning and spiteful to the people of the United States and our world companions.
He claims America comes first however doesn’t make it obvious.
His tariffs don’t benefit “we the people.”
Peter Sena
Naples, Fla.
The Supreme Court did the nation a disservice by not addressing whether or not the federal government should pay back the tariff revenues it has collected.
Ambiguous rulings end in tens of millions of {dollars} that should be spent in pointless further legal charges earlier than decrease federal courts and appellate courts determine what occurs to the tariff {dollars} already collected.
Paul Feiner
Greenburgh
The tariff ruling might have been “disloyal” to Trump, however it was loyal to the Constitution the justices swore to guard.
Trump had clearly overreached his authority.
His smears of the justices who ruled towards his tariffs show he has no business holding the very best workplace within the land, and by no means has.
Dennis Middlebrooks
Brooklyn
Foreign nations have sucked us dry and allow us to carry the burdens of the world for too long.
Now that we have now a probability to make the world deal with us with respect and never as a money register, the Supreme Court doesn’t back our chief.
Its reasoning that Trump’s tariffs are unlawful is BS.
Brenda Hodgkiss
Atlantic Highlands, NJ
No different nation on the planet permits foreigners to intervene with their politics, however the Supreme Court — which says it has no time to listen to 99% of appeals from Americans — agreed to take this silly case, whose plaintiff is a proxy for China, the massive witch behind the scenes.
Chief Justice Roberts used legalese to undo the tariffs.
Trump ought to appoint solely judges just like the great Justice Clarence Thomas.
Andrew Delaney
Jamaica Estates
Get opinions and commentary from our columnists
Subscribe to our day by day Post Opinion e-newsletter!
Thanks for signing up!
The Issue: Expected protests that compelled the canceling of a lecture by CBS’s Bari Weiss at UCLA.
The Bari Weiss lecture at UCLA would have been of great benefit to college students there.
But the twenty first century’s brownshirts — the pro-Palestinian campus thugs — posed an excessive amount of of a risk (“Bari cancels UCLA speech,” Feb. 21).
One mustn’t underestimate the hazard of this development.
It mirrors the “Gleichschaltung,” the consolidation of energy underneath the Nazis on German tutorial campuses.
Its important options included the gradual however inexorable elimination of Jews from campus life, after which from campuses altogether.
Daniel Trigoboff
Williamsville
This Jew-hating therapy of Weiss has UCLA heading towards a Nazi-like future.
UCLA professors like Robin Kelly are Zionophobes whose toxic pedagogy encourages college students to embrace every part Hamas.
At this level, there’s no more than a scintilla of distinction between UCLA right this moment and universities in Nazi Germany in 1933-1945.
Richard Sherman
Margate, Fla.
Want to weigh in on right this moment’s tales? Send your ideas (alongside along with your full title and metropolis of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters are subject to modifying for readability, size, accuracy, and magnificence.
