Brace for battle as Hochul revives NY gerrymander – Latest News
Republicans and all fair-minded New York voters dodged a bullet in March.
That’s when the US Supreme Court halted a lawsuit that aimed to redraw New York City’s solely GOP House seat out of existence — the third spherical of Empire State redistricting in as many election cycles.
But on Wednesday the gerrymander frenzy amongst New York Democrats sparked anew, after the high courtroom struck down race-based redistricting in a landmark case.
Gov. Kathy Hochul howled that the justices had been “clearly carrying out Donald Trump’s will with this decision.”
State Sen. Mike Gianaris (D-Queens) referred to as it “a five-alarm fire for the defense of free and fair elections.”
Both instantly leaped on the likelihood to turbocharge their dream strategy: amending the state Constitution to “reform” its ban on partisan gerrymandering.
Compared to that effort, the failed lawsuit concentrating on a single district, now held by GOP Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, was small potatoes.
That grievance — spearheaded by Democratic “superlawyer” Marc Elias — argued that the Staten Island-centered eleventh Congressional District disenfranchised minority voters (regardless that Malliotakis is herself a Latina).
It was a nakedly partisan attempt by Democrats to get Rep. Hakeem Jeffries one seat nearer to the speaker’s gavel in November’s midterm elections.
Now, it seems, that wasn’t the ultimate battle in New York’s redistricting wars.
On the face of it, Albany Democrats’ fingers are tied on this regard: The state Constitution restricts partisan gerrymandering, with a measure that’s essentially the most strong of any state within the nation.
An modification that was authorized overwhelmingly by voters in 2014 — after passing within the Legislature with bipartisan help — empowers an unbiased redistricting commission, not elected legislators, to attract district traces as soon as a decade, following the federal Census.
But final summer time, Gianaris and Assemblyman Micah Lasher (D-Manhattan) launched one other modification that will permit Albany to redraw New York’s House districts at any time when one other state conducts a mid-decade redistricting — as Texas did final yr.
The Gianaris-Lasher modification can’t take impact till authorized by two consecutively elected Legislatures, as nicely as the voters in a referendum.
Get opinions and commentary from our columnists
Subscribe to our day by day Post Opinion e-newsletter!
Thanks for signing up!
And now, Hochul is throwing her weight behind it.
“New York has always led the fight for voting rights and we’ll lead again,” she posted Wednesday.
“I’m working with the Legislature to change New York’s redistricting process so we can fight back against Washington’s attempts to rig our democracy.”
It isn’t the primary time Albany Democrats pushed to undo the reforms voters demanded in 2014.
After taking control of each homes of the Legislature in 2019, Democrats put ahead an modification that will have gutted the Constitution’s anti-gerrymandering safeguards.
But their scheme to return the Empire State to the unhealthy outdated days when partisanship reigned over the redistricting course of was foiled . . . by the voters.
When the modification went earlier than the public within the 2021 normal election, it misplaced handily, and the state Constitution’s protections towards partisan gerrymandering stay in impact as we speak.
Beyond partisanship, the modification’s sponsors are prone to push for a vote on it for personal political causes.
Lasher is in a powerful race for the Democratic nomination to switch retiring Rep. Jerry Nadler.
Sponsoring this attention-grabbing partisan modification undoubtedly bolsters his title recognition, and his odds of a main win, in a single of the nation’s most liberal House districts.
And the 56-year-old Gianaris, the political architect of the Democrats’ 2018 state Senate takeover, is retiring this yr: Getting the Legislature to approve the primary passage of this modification can be one final feather in his cap — and a useful calling card for future political efforts.
Passing this modification via two consecutive Legislatures is the simple half: After all, Albany Democrats take pleasure in lopsided majorities in each homes.
But getting the state’s voters to go together with such an obscenely partisan constitutional modification may not be as a lot of a layup as Lasher, Gianaris, Hochul and their comrades would possibly assume.
The voters of New York actually skew Democrat, however at key moments they’ve proven Democratic elites that they’ve an unbiased streak.
Voters in 2021 didn’t simply reject Albany’s attempt to water down the Constitution’s ban on gerrymandering; in addition they defeated amendments backed by Democratic leaders that will have allowed for same-day voter registration and no-excuse absentee voting.
Even in New York, one of America’s bluest states, voters — over the desires of the Democratic institution — had been prepared to defeat these cynical makes an attempt to undermine the state structure’s electoral safeguards.
They ought to prepare to take action again.
Joseph T. Burns is a associate within the law firm Holtzman Vogel and a New York state-based election lawyer.
