Xavier Becerra has more questions to answer about – Latest News
Xavier Becerra says he didn’t know that his former chief of employees and former political aide had been taking money from his California marketing campaign account and mendacity to the federal government about it.
On the gubernatorial debate stage on Thursday, he performed the sufferer. Prosecutors stated he was not concerned, he claimed.
But his rivals within the main — together with Steve Hilton and Katie Porter — weren’t having it.
In reality, they advised, Becerra may nonetheless be indicted. Maybe even when he made the overall election.
Xavier Becerra says he didn’t know that his former chief of employees and former political aide had been taking money from his California marketing campaign account and mendacity to the federal government about it. Noah Berger for CA Post
Of course they’d say that, Becerra countered. This is an election. Anything goes.
So what’s the reality?
The means the media inform the story, Dana Williamson and Sean McCluskie raided Becerra’s outdated marketing campaign account to fund lavish existence. The Department of Justice has leaned into that narrative, saying in a press release that Williamson, McCluskie, and lobbyist Greg Campbell stole “approximately $225,000 in funds” from Becerra’s marketing campaign “to pay for McCluskie’s bicoastal lifestyle.”
Williamson additionally allegedly defrauded the pandemic-era Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) by taking loans for her lobbying firm, although lobbying companies weren’t eligible.
Of course they’d say that, Becerra countered. This is an election. Anything goes. REUTERS
No doubt, abnormal greed could have been a issue.
And as Republican Carl DeMaio of the State Assembly famous final yr, the Williamson case uncovered Sacramento’s “unelected and largely unknown network of political consultants and lobbyists who are enriching themselves and trading favors on behalf of their clients.”
But this was more than simply an attempt to grab money.
Sign up for the California Morning Report publication
California’s high information, sports activities and leisure delivered to your inbox on daily basis.
Thanks for signing up!
As the federal indictment in opposition to Williamson has it, the complete objective of the $225,000 scheme was to permit McCluskie to take a job in Washington working for “Public Official 1” — Becerra.
Becerra, whom President Joe Biden had appointed to lead the Department of Health and Human Services regardless of his whole lack of expertise in health care, wished his trusted staffer in D.C.
But this was more than simply an attempt to grab money. REUTERS
The drawback: McCluskie would have to take a wage cut. And he had payments to pay.
So, the indictment alleges, Williamson took marketing campaign funds — and her own money — and laundered it by a company which, in flip, paid McCluskie’s spouse for a no-show job.
The scheme was set up in order that Becerra may have his man.
Becerra says he didn’t know about the theft. But he benefited, albeit not directly.
So when Becerra claims he didn’t know, that’s a little arduous to imagine.
At the very least, it ought to immediate more questions.
And for voters, some very critical doubts.
