I’m the surrogate mother trying to save a baby’s – Latest News
Surrogate mother McKenna West was horrified when the mother and father of the child she was carrying ordered her to abort the youngster over a delivery defect. West moved to Texas and gave delivery, with the organic mother and father taking the youngster. With the two sides nonetheless locked in a legal battle, West tells The Post the solely factor she desires:
I’m a mother and cardiac nurse from Alaska, and I’ve spent my profession retaining people alive. Never in my wildest desires did I think about I’d spend this yr preventing in courtrooms in three states to protect the heartbeat of a child I delivered myself.
Surrogate mother on defying abort order
Due to the onslaught of media protection about my case — some true, some not — I’d like to set the file straight on what occurred and why I’m preventing for this treasured child boy.
Last yr, I agreed to be a surrogate for a couple in California. In April, after I was 20 weeks pregnant with the youngster, a routine ultrasound revealed the motive I now discover myself embroiled in a number of bitter legal battles: The child I carried had hypoplastic left coronary heart syndrome, a severe, however treatable, congenital coronary heart defect.
To deal with a child with HLHS, surgeons carry out a staged restore, starting with the Norwood process shortly after delivery, adopted by two more surgical procedures. This medical remedy offers youngsters a high probability of occurring to reside full lives.
Yet when the contracting couple heard about the HLHS prognosis, my worst fears got here true: They ordered me to terminate the being pregnant. They needed me to abort the treasured youngster I used to be carrying.
A great shot at survival
No girl ought to be compelled to kill the child inside her. Most importantly, each youngster deserves a probability to reside.
As a cardiac nurse, I knew this infant had a great shot at survival if given the alternative to obtain the obligatory remedy.
After I communicated to the contracting couple that I couldn’t finish this child’s life, their lawyer and my own former lawyer despatched me letters threatening six-figure penalties if I didn’t adjust to their demand to terminate. The contracting couple cut off my funds, and I lined the relaxation of the being pregnant bills myself.
“Never in my wildest dreams did I imagine I’d spend this year fighting in courtrooms in three states to preserve the heartbeat of a baby I delivered myself,” West writes. McKenna West
The threats finally turned actual: The contracting couple filed claims towards me in Alaska demanding at least 100 thousand {dollars} $100,000 as a result of I didn’t finish their son’s life.
But no risk or quantity of money may sway my conviction that this child had a actual probability at a full life, and I couldn’t take part in killing him and depriving him of that chance. All I needed was for the contracting couple to commit to giving this child lifesaving remedy. But they refused.
So, I made my own plans to save him. My home state didn’t have a hospital geared up with the surgical procedure he’d need at delivery. After in depth analysis, I discovered a hospital in Texas with glorious surgical outcomes, together with a 100% survival fee for the Norwood process. I additionally had mates in the space who may assist my youngsters and me by this tough time.
The contracting couple needed me to ship the child at a hospital in California, however that hospital didn’t have the similar excellent observe file of success, and I had no one to assist me there.
Get opinions and commentary from our columnists
Subscribe to our day by day Post Opinion publication!
Thanks for signing up!
Still, I agreed to give up any declare to the child, if they might merely commit to the surgical procedure that may save his life.
But after months in courtroom, they continued to refuse this common-sense settlement. So, placing my job on maintain, I moved my two youngsters to Texas and delivered the place I knew the child boy would have the best odds at survival and my youngsters and me would have assist. He got here into this world on Aug. 12, and I’m instructed he acquired his first surgical procedure.
Hardly ‘political theater’
People have known as this political theater. It isn’t. This is about giving an harmless youngster a shot at the life he deserves. I’m eternally grateful that the Texas household courtroom and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton ordered that the child boy I carried should obtain the obligatory surgical procedure.
Yet this matter nonetheless isn’t settled. The contracting couple is actively working to get the courtroom order that required the child’s continued remedy thrown out.
It is unthinkable to me to give delivery to a treasured, residing, respiratory child boy and but deny him the probability to survive.
I’m not preventing to attempt to take another person’s child. I’m preventing as a result of this child boy wants somebody keen to advocate for and battle alongside him as he will get the ongoing remedy his fragile coronary heart requires. And it seems that somebody is me. With the legal help of Alliance Defending Freedom, I’ve requested for just one factor from the very starting: A dedication that this child can be offered the life-saving remedy he wants. That is all it might take to finish this.
I haven’t been allowed to maintain this treasured child boy I carried and guarded all through my being pregnant. The solely glimpse I acquired of him was during a very short 60 seconds whereas his umbilical wire was nonetheless linked. As quickly as the wire was cut, he was taken away.
You might know the story of King Solomon. Two ladies stood earlier than him, claiming to be the mother of a youngster. But just one was dedicated to giving the youngster life. Today, that very same story is enjoying out in US courts. Two sides are in a dispute, however just one of us is committing to lifesaving care. My plea, my solely aim, is easy: Let’s commit to giving this child the full remedy he wants to reside.
