Lindsay Clancy supporters may see mistrial as a – Latest News
Millions of American ladies are celebrating a victory of types this weekend — a hung jury within the Lindsay Clancy trial.
The case’s future is unsure. It will seemingly be tough to seek out enough jurors succesful of coming to an unbiased choice after the whole nation has been riveted by this trial.
Follow The Post’s stay updates on the Lindsay Clancy trial
It seems that 11 members of the jury favored some type of leniency, whether or not a not guilty by cause of madness verdict or a lesser conviction, whereas one male holdout compelled the jury to hold. He was, it appeared, a modern-day “Juror 8” from the well-known play Twelve Angry Men — however in reverse.
This is a victory for Clancy, whose staff will now enter both one other trial with the prospect of one other sympathetic jury or plea negotiations with the higher hand.
Vigil organizer Renee Kimball, heart, of Maine, stands with Lindsay Clancy supporters for a second of silence outdoors Plymouth Superior Court on Aug. 20. USA TODAY Network through Reuters Connect
It’s one step ahead for Clancy, however one step backward for womankind. In the aftermath of the death of famed feminist activist Gloria Steinem, ladies have discovered ourselves set back generations, by the hands of Steinem’s proteges.
Growing up, we have been instructed we might do something. We might be an astronaut, an engineer, a surgeon, and even the president. Now, apparently, the sport is off.
Do you need a space shuttle piloted by a girl who might expertise such excessive hormonal temper swings that she might snap and homicide everybody else on board?
Would you trust a building engineered by a girl whose judgment may be clouded by a cocktail of SSRIs and different mood-altering drugs?
And when the primary feminine commander-in-chief decides it’s time to go to warfare with Paraguay, ought to the generals ask: Madam President, are you sure — or are you simply mad since you’re PMSing?
Here’s the newest on Lindsay Clancy’s homicide trial:
It’s not simply within the skilled realm that Lindsay Clancy has set back womankind. In essentially the most important approach, Clancy and her supporters have endangered essentially the most sacred function a girl can ever maintain: that of a mom.
Across social media during the trial, legions of moms posted in assist of Clancy, claiming they may simply have been her. They mentioned their own postpartum struggles and, inexplicably, advised that these struggles made them in some way “vulnerable” to the identical affliction they are saying drove Clancy to homicide her youngsters.
Lindsay Clancy supporters collect at Plymouth Superior Court the place Clancy is on trial for the death of her three youngsters on Sept. 2, 2026, in Plymouth, Mass. Josh Reynolds for NY Post
Despite mendacity to suppliers about the truth that she was a risk to herself and others, and regardless of by no means presenting with postpartum psychosis, Clancy was, we now know, certainly a lethal risk.
And now, each time a girl presents with melancholy, anxiousness, suicidal ideation, or intrusive ideas, a cloud of suspicion can cling over her.
Clancy’s supporters declare that her husband Patrick by no means ought to have left her alone with their youngsters. But observe that argument to its logical conclusion, and tens of millions of American males haven’t solely license however a duty to limit their wives’ freedom with their own youngsters.
Get opinions and commentary from our columnists
Subscribe to our each day Post Opinion e-newsletter!
Thanks for signing up!
Clancy’s supporters have greased the slippery slope, and so they gained’t benefit from the journey to the underside.
If Patrick Clancy didn’t do enough, then the argument holds that any girl experiencing severe postpartum struggles ought to lose custody and unsupervised visitation. Mom is simply too unstable to be trusted together with her own youngsters; higher go away them with Dad, who isn’t vulnerable to the violent hormonal and psychiatric instability we now have simply spent months being instructed can overtake a mom with out warning.
Defendant Lindsay Clancy watches jurors enter the courtroom as the jury resumes deliberations in Plymouth Superior Court in Plymouth, Massachusetts, on Friday. through REUTERS
For a long time, feminists fought towards the concept that ladies have been too emotional, too hormonal and too unstable to be trusted with the identical duties as males.
Gloria Steinem’s era demanded that ladies be judged by the identical requirements as males as a result of ladies have been equally succesful of assembly them.
Now, because of their empathy for one girl, Lindsay Clancy’s defenders are making the other case: that a girl’s hormones, biology, and mental health can render her fully incapable of controlling herself, a lot in order that she will’t even be held liable for the homicide of her three youngsters.
Congratulations to Lindsay Clancy’s defenders. They may have helped cling a jury. But within the course of, they resurrected the oldest argument towards feminine equality — and dressed it up as feminism.
