Obama’s ‘profound hypocrisy’, ending Hamas’ aid – Latest News
Libertarian: Obama’s ‘Profound Hypocrisy’
After “former President Barack Obama applauded Harvard University for standing up to the Trump administration” in protection of the varsity’s First Amendment rights, Reason’s Robby Soave costs Obama with “profound hypocrisy,” since his “administration carried out the exact same policy against . . . virtually every college and university in the country,” compelling “schools that receive federal funding to change their sexual misconduct policies in ways that undermined basic due process” and “harmed free speech and academic freedom.”
“Moreover, the Obama-era policies were stridently opposed by Harvard’s law faculty,” however the
college caved.
“It’s a good thing that Harvard has found its spine,” however “it’s risible for Obama to complain” in regards to the federal authorities stifling tutorial freedom.
Mideast watch: Ending Hamas’ Aid Racket
There’s “just no denying” anymore that “Hamas controls humanitarian aid shipments into Gaza,” notes Commentary’s Seth Mandel, and “The Wall Street Journal reports that” Israel’s resolution to cut off that aid “is making it impossible for Hamas to keep its terrorist foot soldiers paid.”
How?
“The terror group hijacked food aid” after which impoverished civilians” by promoting it back to them at high
costs.
Some aid teams acquired digital money however to buy their food, “Gazans then have to use a money-changer” that reportedly “works for Hamas” and costs 20% commission.
Now Israel has cut off aid and says it killed a key money-changer that financed Hamas.
“This is how you defeat a terrorist army.”
“Deprive it of physical goods and money and watch it disintegrate.”
Culture critic: The TERFs Were Right
UK ladies saying the “basic truth” that women and men are biologically distinct have been “written off as bigots, conspiracy theorists, hysterics,” thunders Graham Linehan at Spiked.
“But they were right. And now it’s official,” due to a Supreme Court ruling affirming “what a lot of women found themselves, to their surprise and dismay, having to argue for years.”
“These women lost jobs and friends, were thrown in cells, made the subject of mockery and smears by the press.”
Worse, they had been informed the complicated new language was progress.
Yet the ruling proves “that standing up works. That holding the line works. That saying ‘no’ works.”
It’s lit “the beacon that shows the way.”
Keep up with immediately’s most important information
Stay up on the very newest with Evening Update.
Thanks for signing up!
Capitol Hill: Chuck Schumer’s Blue-Slip Charade
“Sen. Chuck Schumer must really be worried about losing the Democratic base” — simply take a look at him “pretending that Jay Clayton is a threat to the rule of law,” snarks The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board.
Clayton is President Trump’s nominee for US lawyer in Manhattan, “and he’s a fine choice.”
He’s headed the SEC and labored for a high law firm.
He’s actually “no patsy” — and is about pretty much as good an appointee for prosecutor as Schumer might count on.
Yet Schumer is vowing to carry up his nomination by not returning his “blue slip”; these slips consult with the custom of “giving courtesy to Senators’ views on the judges and prosecutors picked for their home states.”
If Schumer drags this out, “expect renewed arguments in the GOP about ending this whole blue-slip business” altogether.
Trade beat: Mining Our Own Business
“China’s decision to suspend exports of rare earth minerals highlights a significant national security vulnerability that cannot be addressed by executive power alone,” observe the Washington Examiner’s editors.
“Three decades ago, the United States dominated the global rare earth minerals market. However, it frittered away this power because the government bowed to a combination of globalist naiveté and
environmental absolutism.”
The repair?
“Biden and the Democrats exempted new semiconductor manufacturing plants from burdensome allowing necessities underneath the National Environmental Policy Act, however they didn’t do the identical for uncommon
earth mineral manufacturing.
Trump ought to work with Congress to repeal NEPA totally, however even when that can not be carried out, uncommon earth minerals needs to be added to the checklist of initiatives immune from NEPA prices and delays.”
— Compiled by The Post Editorial Board
