Dems at a loss to stop Trump, ending states’ – Latest News
From the proper: Dems at a Loss To Stop Trump
Democrats in the present day are “engaged in bitter infighting and struggling to come up with a unified strategy to oppose Trump,” observes The Washington Times’ Byron York. Meanwhile, Trump is “setting the agenda” and “putting together one of the most consequential presidencies in years.” Lacking the Russia-collusion narrative “to use as a cudgel against the Trump administration,” Democrats are relying as a substitute on “lawfare” to thwart him and utilizing “1960s-style civil disobedience” ways as symbols of “resistance.” Yet “Democrats are still on the wrong side of a number of issues, like immigration, wokeism, and national security.” Indeed, Democratic Socialist NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani “is a walking nightmare for Democrats who hope to win back voter support nationally.”
Budget hawk: Ending States’ Medicaid Scams
“The House version of the ‘one big beautiful bill’ started to clean up a financing scheme that lets states abuse the Medicaid program for extra money,” cheers Red Jahncke at The Wall Street Journal. And “the Senate version is poised to finish the job.” The scheme entails states taxing suppliers (primarily hospitals) after which returning the tax through a “supplemental payment” that triggers federal matching funds. Both the House and Senate set a moratorium on new and better supplier taxes, however the Senate would decrease them, producing “major savings” and a “sorely needed” trim in Medicaid enrollment. “Government programs should be straightforward, transparent and cost-effective. The provider tax scheme is the opposite.” Senate reforms would each “save money” and “move states in the direction of good government.”
Conservative: Social Security Is Already Broke
More From Post Editorial Board
The Social Security trustees “warn that by 2033” this system “won’t have the money to pay retirees’ full benefits,” however, in actual fact, it “already doesn’t have the money,” argues Merrill Matthews at The Hill. The program’s “trust fund boasts some $2.5 trillion in assets,” nevertheless it should faucet into that money to pay out advantages, because it doles out more than it brings in. Plus, “that $2.5 trillion isn’t invested in stocks or bonds or loaned out to interest-paying banks or companies. The federal government has borrowed that money and spent it, writing itself interest-bearing IOUs.” Meaning, so as to pay out advantages, the federal government is “creating new debt to pay old debt.” The trust fund “is already essentially, if not technically, depleted.”
Every morning, the NY POSTcast provides a deep dive into the headlines with the Post’s signature combine of politics, business, popular culture, true crime and all the things in between. Subscribe right here!
Foreign desk: Pooh-Poohing the Strikes on Iran
“There’s a debate raging right now about the effectiveness of the strikes that Israel and the U.S. inflicted on Iran,” stemming from a CNN article that claimed they failed to destroy Tehran’s nuclear websites, notes PJ Media’s Chris Queen. “It’s all an effort to discredit President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pet Hegseth.” The piece, for starters, was based mostly on “unnamed sources.” And Israeli intelligence, “which is much closer to the situation,” says even when the US strike didn’t completely obliterate Iran’s nuclear program, it set the Islamic Republic back “several years.” Note, too, provides Queen, that one of the reporters on the CNN piece was Natasha Bertrand, who pushed the false “claim that the New York Post report about Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation.”
Culture beat: Population Growth Is Ending
“People are having fewer children — much fewer,” experiences Bill King at RealClear Politics. And so, whereas many have long assumed the worldwide population will keep growing, the United Nations simply “lowered its global population projections” — the “demographic math has changed.” And keep in mind that population projections matter vastly, as a result of they form “everything from how we plan cities to how we fund pensions”; in the event that they’re “off by a billion people,” that’s not simply a rounding error. It’s a seismic shift within the underlying math of the longer term.” Still, “the data clearly indicate” that the period of persevering with growth “is rapidly coming to a close. “What follows, and how we react to it, is one of the most critical and least understood stories of our time.”
— Compiled by The Post Editorial Board
