Uber says over 100 sexual assault accusers – Business News
Uber mentioned it discovered more than 100 situations wherein passengers who claimed its drivers sexually assaulted or harassed them supplied bogus or doctored receipts to show ridership, or didn’t clarify their incapability to supply receipts.
In a Wednesday courtroom submitting, Uber urged US District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco to order 21 plaintiffs with suspect receipts to justify why their claims shouldn’t be dismissed, and 90 plaintiffs to supply receipts or “non-boilerplate” causes for his or her absence.
At least 11 law corporations signify the varied plaintiffs, courtroom papers show. Those corporations had no rapid remark or didn’t instantly reply to requests for touch upon Thursday. They weren’t accused of wrongdoing.
Uber mentioned it discovered more than 100 situations wherein passengers who claimed its drivers sexually assaulted or harassed them supplied bogus or doctored receipts to show ridership Christopher Sadowski
Uber is making an attempt to cut back its legal responsibility in nationwide federal litigation comprising more than 2,450 lawsuits alleging driver misconduct. It faces a number of hundred extra lawsuits in San Francisco Superior Court.
The San Francisco-based company has maintained it shouldn’t be responsible for prison conduct by drivers it connects with passengers, and that its background checks and disclosures had been adequate.
On July 8, Breyer dismissed some fraud and legal responsibility claims that had been primarily based on advertisements selling Uber’s ride-sharing service as a protected various to drunk driving.
In Wednesday’s submitting, Uber mentioned some faux receipts seem to have been generated by way of third-party web sites.
In Wednesday’s submitting, Uber mentioned some faux receipts seem to have been generated by way of third-party web sites. thanakorn – stock.adobe.com
Uber mentioned some receipts contained math errors or bogus surcharges, modified feminine driver names to male names, had been timestamped earlier than rides occurred, had stray marks, or used formatting that doesn’t match its own.
One plaintiff submitted two receipts for a single journey, whereas two plaintiffs submitted totally different variations of the identical receipt, the company mentioned.
“Nothing is more critical to the integrity of our judicial system than honesty,” Uber mentioned. “It is difficult to conceive an act of misconduct graver than the outright fabrication of evidence that plaintiffs here undertook.”
The case is In re Uber Technologies Inc Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 23-03084.
