Judging the ‘Sedition Six’: Letters – Latest News
The Issue: The FBI probe of six Democrats who urged navy members to refuse unlawful orders.
The six Democrats who urged service members to disobey what they call “illegal orders” ought to all be censured, at the very least (“Dems in for a battle,” Nov. 26).
Dems have gone to date off the deep finish of their psychotic hatred of President Trump that someway, they really feel justified in making seditious statements like this.
Since navy recruitment has been growing, it will appear that the heroes in our navy would beg to vary with these fools.
Robert DiNardo
Farmingdale
The Dems’ newest political stunt was to warn our troops to not observe illegal orders, creating additional grist for the Trump Derangement Syndrome mill. However, what these Democrats did was not sedition.
Our troops know to not observe illegal orders — they’re indoctrinated on this all through their careers. As a cadet at West Point, I used to be informed to not observe illegal orders in my necessary law course. Those instructors weren’t committing sedition by telling me this.
One of the best classes of the Second World War was that having to “follow orders” doesn’t excuse one’s crimes. This isn’t rocket science. It’s simply politicians doing one other of the many reprehensible issues they do.
Charles Michael Sitero
Ormond Beach, Fla.
Well, if Democrats are urging our navy personnel to disregard and disobey orders from the president, I feel it’s solely truthful to make a counter-offer.
When a Democratic-controlled Congress tells the American people they’re raising our taxes, our response must be: We received’t pay it. Go pound sand.
Myron Hecker
Pearl River
Sen. Mark Kelly utilizing his naval service to guard himself from the penalties of his phrases is disgraceful.
I’m a former senior naval officer (23 years of energetic service). One of my tasks was to coach subordinates in things like “legal orders.”
Kelly’s phrases now make this work tougher. I’m ashamed that I ever wore the identical uniform he did.
Rocco P. Cascone Jr.
Staten Island
For all who known as upon the navy to refuse to observe unlawful orders, there can solely be one response: Arrest and prosecution.
Ken Karcinell
Hewlett
The Issue: Rep. Jasmine Crockett’s declare that Lee Zeldin accepted donations from the late Jeffrey Epstein.
Rep. Jasmine Crockett appeared to ridicule EPA head Lee Zeldin and lots of others with their connections to Jeffrey Epstein, solely to have it backfire (“Wrong Epstein’s plan for payback,” Nov. 22).
Then, in her typical condescending voice, she tried to stroll it back by saying this wasn’t the Jeffrey Epstein that she was referring to. She mentioned it, and she or he lied — finish of story. This is who now we have representing us in authorities.
Lorraine Fittipaldi
Apollo Beach, Fla.
Clueless airhead Jasmine Crockett claimed that Jeffrey Epstein donated to Lee Zeldin’s marketing campaign when Zeldin was a New York consultant.
“We gonna expose it all,” she brayed. And she sure did. She uncovered herself to be an incompetent hack and typical leftist anti-Trump Democrat.
It seems two totally different Jeffery Epsteins donated to Zeldin after the late intercourse offender dedicated suicide. Great analysis: Crockett’s workers is as ill-suited for the job as she is.
Walter Goldeski
East Brunswick, NJ
Jasmine Crockett must be forgiven for considering that the convicted baby sex-offender Jeffrey Epstein was making marketing campaign contributions after his death: Given all the votes Democrats historically get from lifeless people, her error is fully comprehensible.
Carole Campolo
East Hampton
Want to weigh in on at the moment’s tales? Send your ideas (alongside along with your full title and metropolis of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters are subject to enhancing for readability, size, accuracy, and elegance.
