TSA airport chaos should be illegal — because – Latest News
For weeks now, annoyed vacationers attempting to catch flights all around the United States have been caught in hours-long security-check traces as overwhelmed Transportation Security Administration brokers have been pressured to work with out pay.
It’s not the primary time that federal funding for TSA — a extremely seen service that impacts thousands and thousands of Americans each day — has been caught up in a political brawl in Congress, this time over immigration enforcement.
It doesn’t must be this manner.
In truth, it by no means should have occurred, not even as soon as.
That’s because taxpayers and vacationers already pay for transportation security, not by means of their taxes however by means of their aircraft tickets.
The federally mandated Passenger Security Fee, first levied after the 9/11 terrorist assaults to help fund TSA screening actions, has more than doubled since its inception.
Today, it provides an $11.20 charge to each round-trip ticket buy — more than $4.5 billion in 2025 alone.
The charge is one of a number of government-mandated add-on costs, together with a ticket excise tax, flight section charges and passenger facility costs, that add taxes of 15% to 30% on each airline ticket you buy.
And whereas the lion’s share of Passenger Security Fee income was supposed to stick with TSA, Congress has chosen to divert a lot of it to feed an already fattened hyena.
Bipartisan Budget Acts handed in 2013 and 2018 funneled large chunks of Passenger Security Fee proceeds away from TSA and into the Treasury’s common fund, the place it may possibly be spent in any manner authorities officers need.
Congress deceptively portrayed that call as a matter of “deficit reduction,” however we will see how properly that’s labored.
If these assets had remained with TSA the place they belonged, the company might have constructed up an emergency fund to help tide these important employees over during authorities shutdowns.
Or possibly the money might have enabled technology investments to hurry passengers by means of checkpoints all yr spherical.
Airlines would be on strong ethical, if not legal, ground to drag out of this charade and easily stop accumulating the Passenger Security Fee.
They will not be answerable for this mess: The blame belongs on the massive, bloated toes of our federal authorities.
To do proper by taxpayers, who are actually actually paying $11.20 apiece to attend in line, Congress and President Donald Trump have 4 selections.
First, they’ll stop squandering Passenger Security Fee revenues on unrelated federal applications.
This means repealing the provisions from the 2013 and 2018 legal guidelines that permit these shenanigans, requiring the funds to be instantly spent on TSA operations and investments and capping the charge so taxpaying vacationers aren’t gouged for presidency providers.
Get opinions and commentary from our columnists
Subscribe to our each day Post Opinion publication!
Thanks for signing up!
The solely permissible diversion of any collections should be a small share for TSA’s Inspector General, which should oversee charge collections and guarantee TSA makes use of the funding correctly.
Another option is to show over passenger security to airports and different non-public entities.
Private security contracts, overseen by authorities regulators, are commonplace in lots of international locations — and are already used at some US airports.
TSA has often embarrassed itself with security lapses, poor gear selections and the padded personnel budgets that always accompany slapdash federal company expansions.
Alternatively, Congress might repeal the Passenger Security Fee totally and fund the forward-facing portion of TSA’s duties solely by means of common revenues.
That would at the least give taxpaying vacationers a break on ticket costs.
One last option: Congress might fulfill its 2013 and 2018 claims.
Change the identify to the “Special Deficit Reduction Fee” and require the income to go on to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, to trim down the $39 trillion in borrowing our authorities has foisted on future generations of taxpayers.
It’s not significantly honest or logical to have air vacationers help clean up Washington’s profligate spending habits — however at the least it will be more trustworthy than selecting their pockets for one thing that doesn’t shorten airport security traces.
In truth, each the president’s Fiscal Year 2026 finances and bipartisan laws in Congress known as the SAFEGUARDS Act already suggest to finish the underhanded Passenger Security Fee diversion.
This is no longer about ICE enforcement, or immigration coverage basically, or the separation of powers — it’s about our money.
Get to work, Washington.
Pete Sepp is president of National Taxpayers Union.
