New York Times is losing its mind because – Latest News
This isn’t being pregnant. It’s a political plot.
A full-blown, unhinged conspiracy orchestrated by the MAGA motion to take over the hearts, minds and uteruses of gestating people everywhere in the nation, one bassinet, one burp, one stretch mark at a time.
The New York Times has cracked the code. It’s Pulitzer time, child!
In an investigation masquerading as a fashion piece, the Paper of Record printed an unglued commentary, researched with the self-seriousness of Watergate, revealing that a whopping three girls related to the White House are preggers.
At the identical time!
That Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, Katie Miller, the spouse of White House deputy chief of employees for coverage Stephen Miller and Second Lady Usha Vance ought to all be on the nest concurrently isn’t simply a pleased mini child growth. It is — in accordance with the Times — a pernicious “Handmaid’s Tale”-style political plot selling conservative child-making frenzy in an age of declining birthrates and the collapse of the Democratic Party in center America.
It’s a cautionary fable, a warning that the dreaded GOP’s regular price of replica amid a Democratic child drought poses a dire risk to the nation.
According to the Gray Lady (now Gray Female-Identifying Newspaper) Republicans are planning to win help and ever-greater numbers of adherents by growing their own voters. One toddler at a time.
It’s all specified by the piece entitled “The Politics and Power of the Pregnancy Image.”
US Second Lady Usha Vance (R) attends the 2026 World Cup Group D soccer match between Turkey and USA on the Los Angeles Stadium in Inglewood on June 25, 2026. AFP by way of Getty Images
In it, Times chief fashion critic Vanessa Friedman writes: “That three such prominent women in the MAGA movement were pregnant at pretty much the same time was, indubitably, a coincidence.”
Or perhaps not.
“But” — there’s at all times a “but” — “for an administration that has such an intuitive and strategic understanding of the power of aesthetics that an unspoken dress code in which men outfit themselves in the image of the president has developed, it has also become a telling one,” Friedman froths.
Get opinions and commentary from our columnists
Subscribe to our every day Post Opinion e-newsletter!
Thanks for signing up!
“Together, the women have created a notably consistent, and somewhat paradigm-shifting, picture of the White House’s family and fertility platform.”
Fertility platform? Silly me. I believed the three lovelies simply received themselves knocked up.
The author additionally discovered leftist pleasure in taking intention on the body-hugging coral gown that the spouse of Vice President JD Vance allegedly used to showcase her burgeoning bump as she grows the couple’s fourth youngster, a boy, due subsequent month. To The Times, it’s not simply low cost maternity-wear from Old Navy. The garments characterize Mrs. Vance’s sinister technique of broadcasting cuddly daddy vibes emanating from her hub forward of November’s midterm elections.
White House deputy chief of employees Stephen Miller and his spouse Katie arrive on the White House forward of the UFC Freedom 250 on the South Lawn, Sunday, June 14, 2026, in Washington. AP Photo/Alex Brandon
Friedman writes, I assume with a straight face, that Mrs. Vance’s job as second girl “is also to represent and humanize the vice president.”
“By spotlighting her pregnancy,” Friedman spews, “she is doing exactly that.”
And there we’re. To the Times, a bundle of pleasure isn’t a miniature human, no less than when it’s birthed by Republicans. It’s a propaganda device.
Usha Vance took the hit on her motherhood with a elegant smile.
She posted the receipt from her cowl-necked maternity get-up to X, writing “Now that we know the political significance of my $8.75 coral maternity dress from Old Navy, can’t wait to hear what the New York Times has to say about my elastic-waistband pants and compression socks!”
I can’t wait to learn the Times’ tackle the politics of onesies. And the paper’s reply to this burning query: Breastfeeding — natural nutrition, or childish indoctrination?
