Beware the ‘effective altruists’, ‘old-fashioned’ – Latest News
Tech exec: Beware the ‘Effective Altruists’
“Effective Altruism is the unseen force driving AI safety discourse” as “EA crowd is trying to restrict your access to the most important technology of the 21st century,” fumes Shyam Sankar at The Free Press. “EA is a utilitarian philosophy” that “leads in strange directions,” “obsessed with quantifying existential risk”; it “claims rationality and precision,” however “delivers neither” — as, e.g., “a human life can become a rounding error in somebody else’s calculation of the greater good.” These “doomsayers are the Leninist vanguard of the algorithmic age,” writing a recipe for “despair and failure.” No! AI “is underwriting the next 250 years of American greatness,” so “we should insist on the freedom to build it ourselves.”
Legal beat: ‘Old-Fashioned’ Way To Tame AI
A “better approach to AI safety” than a forms of regulators “runs through the old-fashioned legal system,” contends Judge Glock at City Journal. Indeed, “legal claims for damages” in opposition to a company “may provide the best mechanism to prevent the dangers of AI while preserving its advantages.” While “the competitive play of the market forces companies to treat their customers well,” lawsuits have traditionally served to make companies pay for “dangers” they create for “non-customers,” obliging them to “game out dangerous scenarios and prevent them.” Bureaucracies “will never have as much insight” or “incentive” to forestall hurt as the labs themselves. They’d simply “orient the companies to the demands of a small, unrepresentative group.” Far higher to let “lawsuits punish bad behavior.”
Energy beat: Make Data Centers Pay Own Way
“Gas bills are expected to jump in Pennsylvania and other states because ratepayers cover the costs when utilities build new power plants and install pipes and other equipment” to generate “the power that data centers” need, notes RealClear Investigations’ Oliver Lee Bateman. Yet one “obvious solution to rising rates for consumers” is to require these “developers to provide their own power.” Since “Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, and other data center companies” have vowed “to protect consumers from price increases tied to their energy needs,” regulators can mandate working “a separate auction for their own power.” Ex-Rep. Conor Lamb agrees that the onus needs to be on “companies to power their data centers,” not on shoppers to pay.
More From Post Editorial Board
Get opinions and commentary from our columnists
Subscribe to our day by day Post Opinion e-newsletter!
Thanks for signing up!
Conservative: Sydney Triggers the Left — Again
Behind the fury over Sydney Sweeney’s advertisements playing app Novig, argues USA Today’s Ingrid Jacques, is “the overreaction to anything Sweeney touches,” rooted in “her being a registered Republican,” as the American Eagle advert kerfuffle left her “blacklisted” by “progressives, especially the Hollywood crowd.” Female athletes complain Sweeney is “trivializing women’s sports by sexualizing them,” however “she’s not an athlete” — “she’s advertising a product to people who like sports,” period. And: “I don’t recall hearing the same uproar every year when Sports Illustrated releases its swimsuit edition,” which “features models, actresses and, yes, even female athletes in various states of undress.” In truth, Sweeney “is very private about her personal politics,” simply “trying to live her best life and make the most of her 20s” whereas they final. “Let’s not stand in her way.”
Culture critic: Standing Up to Antisemites
Wanting no one inciting antisemitism at a venue he owns, New England Patriots proprietor Robert Kraft pressed Ed Sheeran to drop Macklemore as his opener after the rapper repeatedly slammed Jews onstage, cheers Commentary’s Seth Mandel. After all, “were Macklemore’s dream” of Israel’s destruction “to come true,” thousands and thousands of Jews “would be murdered” and “banished from their homes.” The artist pretends he was fired for supporting Palestinians, but this time the Jewish figures concerned didn’t back off as Jewish advocates normally do: Kraft argued that standing up for Palestinians and in opposition to “Hamas, antisemitism and hate” shouldn’t be “mutually exclusive.” Mandel’s advice for Jews: Don’t “let self-pitying anti-Semites lie.” Speak up! “Mideast discourse desperately needs more truth and more spine.”
— Compiled by The Post Editorial Board
