Andrew Cuomo mayor race, Letters – Latest News
The Issue: The prospect of former Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s comeback to steer the Big Apple as mayor.
Michael Goodwin is spot-on in his description of former Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the tragic state of right this moment’s Democratic Party (“Man who helped destroy the city,” March 19).
From the far-left candidates attempting to out-radical one another within the mayoral race to the corrupt failure that’s Mayor Adams, and now conceited Cuomo, Democrats are destroying this metropolis and state. Presenting Cuomo as a savior — when he ought to have been in jail three years in the past — is akin to Jack the Ripper being hailed as London’s protector.
James McCaffrey
Yonkers
Even earlier than the COVID nursing-home debacle that Cuomo led to, he had already stated one thing that ought to disqualify him from ever holding public workplace: He claimed America “was never that great.”
If he isn’t proud of the nation he was born and raised in and has no respect for its residents or the generations that got here earlier than us, he ought to by no means be allowed to steer or characterize us.
James Lautier
Windsor, Conn.
How about this: Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens and The Bronx break free and change into the new state of New Amsterdam, electing King Andrew — the person who destroyed the town — to rule as governor.
It’s a win-win. The metropolis will get what it deserves, Cuomo will get what he needs, Gov. Hochul is ousted, and the remaining of New York state can lastly rebuild.
James Foley
Airmont
Cuomo’s sexual harassment scandals pale compared to the pointless deaths that resulted from his failed management.
This egomaniac even had the audacity to put in writing a ebook touting his management during COVID — profiting thousands and thousands off a catastrophe of his own making. How might New Yorkers be fooled again?
Maria Cutro
Tenafly, NJ
Can you think about if Cuomo turns into mayor whereas Hochul stays governor, leaving the people of New York City caught within the center?
As actor William Bendix used to say on his TV show: “What a revolting development this is!”
Michael Quartana
Staten Island
The Issue: The ongoing contest in authority between the Trump administration and federal judges.
As Miranda Devine outlines in her column concerning activist judges utilizing lawfare to thwart President Trump’s MAGA insurance policies, it’s time for the Supreme Court to stop this travesty (“Trump fights vile judicial push,” March 20).
The people of this nation voted for Trump to implement the insurance policies he promised. The final time I checked the Constitution, the Executive Branch has the facility to institute such insurance policies.
We all know the Democrats are backing these judges as a result of it’s their final remaining strategy to stop Trump. Well, the people don’t prefer it, and SCOTUS should put an finish to it.
Richard A. Ketay
Newark, NJ
I’m a lifelong Post reader and discover myself more and more dismayed by the current column from Miranda Devine attacking federal judges.
An impartial judiciary is a essential part of the separation of powers outlined in our Constitution. This separation is designed to rein in government overreach and stop the legislature from imposing unconstitutional legal guidelines.
Everyone with a modicum of sense is aware of that the judiciary isn’t excellent, however it’s actually not a instrument of the president or the “radical left” — one of Devine’s favourite bogeymen for her fearmongering.
Jamie Lyn Smith
Brooklyn
Want to weigh in on right this moment’s tales? Send your ideas (alongside along with your full identify and metropolis of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters are subject to enhancing for readability, size, accuracy, and magnificence.
