Dem meltdown over Jeffries-Kushner meeting is a – Latest News
Sometimes a meeting is simply a meeting.
And typically it’s treason.
The meeting in query was between the Democrats’ House minority chief, Hakeem Jeffries, and Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and adviser.
My first response to the information concerning the get-together was most likely like that of most Americans.
OK, two guys from reverse sides had a meeting.
What’s the large deal?
More From Michael Goodwin
After all, people in Washington have conferences all of the time.
And maybe Democrats and Republicans might get more completed for the nation in the event that they typically met privately as a substitute of simply shouting at one another during interviews and campaigns.
Ah, however the guidelines — and common sense — exit the window if you’re the chief of House Dems within the period of Trump.
Then you have to be on a whole battle footing always.
Even the slightest deviation will provoke a storm of denunciations and threats besides you from the job.
Dems’ bloodlust
Consider the response from James Carville, who has migrated from Southern-fried endearing to absolute bonkers-land.
He was early out of the gate in recognizing a capital offense by Jeffries.
“You do not meet with them — don’t have anything to do with them,” Carville declared online.
U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks at “The New Power Structure: Black Politics in the Age of Resistance” panel during the 2026 National Association of Black Journalists Convention on Thursday, August 13, 2026. Getty Images
He insisted that what Jeffries ought to have stated is, “Any business we have is going to be conducted with you under oath.”
Another nutso theme common among the many critics, many of whom are from the occasion’s ascendant far left, was that having the meeting proved Jeffries was not going to be powerful enough on Trump even when Dems win the House.
They need blood and scalps, and if Jeffries isn’t up to the job of being their Speaker, they’ll discover somebody who is.
“Jared Kushner has no actual government job, he just uses his family connections to get money from gulf autocrats and fund corrupt deals. The only way [Jeffries] should work with him is with demands for documents and subpoenas,” Tommy Vietor, a podcaster and former aide to Barack Obama, wrote on X.
Radical lefty Mehdi Hasan, whom CNN calls an “outspoken journalist,” regardless of his as soon as saying that Israel’s battle in Gaza was “worse” than the Holocaust, known as Jeffries’ meeting with Kushner “pathetic.”
Jared Kushner speaks during the inaugural meeting of the Board of Peace on the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace on Thursday, February 19, 2026, in Washington, DC. Getty Images
The nutty blowback dominated the occasion’s response, placing the jittery Jeffries on protection.
In a video post on X, he stated that Kushner “asked for a meeting, and I took it to discuss the affordability crisis that exists that is not a hoax.”
To make it clear he is nonetheless wholeheartedly at battle with Trump, he felt compelled so as to add, “No one is going to get a pass. We’re going to hold every single member of the Trump cartel accountable, beginning on Day 1.”
Calling the administration a “cartel” is like throwing a bone to a pack of ravenous wolves.
No shock, they aren’t glad and demand more.
To show that he is prepared for battle, Jeffries additionally instructed CNN that he hasn’t ruled out impeaching Trump if Democrats win control of the House.
Now that’s more prefer it!
Promises to question the president and members of his cupboard have emerged as an compulsory vow for a lot of of the occasion’s midterm candidates.
The sentiment is so extensively shared that it is seemingly testing nicely in polls of dedicated and swing voters.
So a lot in order that it’s thought of a close to certainty that a transfer to analyze Trump and impeach him could be the primary order of business underneath a Dem-controlled House.
Impeachment hysteria
Even if a majority voted yes on a invoice of particulars, there is nearly zero likelihood the Senate, regardless of which occasion has the bulk, might muster the 67 votes needed to convict and take away him from workplace.
All of which raises the query of why Dems are dedicated to placing themselves on a course that is nearly sure to fail.
Especially when Trump, a consummate dealmaker, would definitely like to move bipartisan laws in his closing two years, if solely to bolster his legacy.
But if Dems take control and are laser-focused on impeachment and little else, they’ll miss a likelihood to get huge issues completed with an keen and prepared president.
Get opinions and commentary from our columnists
Subscribe to our each day Post Opinion e-newsletter!
Thanks for signing up!
Part of the issue to this point is that almost all Dems have little confidence that they’ll win the autumn midterms or the 2028 presidential election on the energy of their home and overseas coverage agendas alone.
They are satisfied that hating Trump, and proving it to voters daily, is their ace within the gap.
That obsession helps clarify why so little consideration has been paid to the sober clarification of why Jeffries and Kushner determined to fulfill.
They labored collectively on jail reforms in Trump’s first time period, and that historical past reportedly led a third occasion who is aware of each males to recommend they get collectively now to discover doable areas of settlement if Dems control the House for the final two years of Trump’s present time period.
Unfortunately, the blowback at Jeffries over a single meeting is a testomony to how the rise of the socialist left has radicalized your entire occasion.
One indication is that there was zero curiosity from the left about what Jeffries and Kushner mentioned, solely unhinged insanity that Jeffries dared to even meet with a consultant of the satan.
The fury additionally underscores how severe the radicals are about gaining full control of the occasion’s total agenda.
Compromise is verboten.
A fundraising electronic mail from a group known as Justice Democrats illustrates how the left is dedicated to driving a wedge between Dems and Israel.
Ignoring the information
The electronic mail declares that the group’s polling finds “a majority of Democratic voters in the first six states to vote in the 2028 party presidential primaries believe ‘Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians’ and that their voters “want a president who will completely cut off weapons to Israel.”
It goes on to denounce the Dems’ congressional leaders, saying “Rep. Hakeem Jeffries and Sen. Chuck Schumer are deeply out of step with their own voters, prioritizing AIPAC over their constituents.”
Neither man has completed something that would moderately be described as “prioritizing AIPAC” — however purpose and information usually are not important to socialist revolutionaries.
They need to overthrow the American system and are assured they’ve the higher hand and don’t really feel any need to compromise.
That is why the uproar over Jeffries’ meeting with Kushner has taken on such significance.
It’s a marker that one thing so simple as speaking to the opposite aspect is not going to be tolerated.
All of which spotlights the essential significance of the midterms.
If antisemitic radicals corresponding to Michigan Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed prevail, Dems could have walked into a lure of their own making and given Trump no purpose to compromise with them.
