Time to take on Obamacare, Dems’ cruel food-stamp – Latest News
Health beat: Time To Take on Obamacare
Democrats hope to use the shutdown to “extort the GOP into extending enriched ObamaCare subsidies” bought as “temporary pandemic support,” observes The Wall Street Journal editorial board.
Yet voters could also be noticing that the Affordable Care Act “has made care worse and more expensive.” Indeed, Democrats are actually “unintentionally reminding” them of the law’s “manifest failures and bad incentives.”
E.g.: They’re “howling” about rising premiums, however that’s “an indictment of the system their party built.”
“Republicans are right to refuse to extend these subsidies — which none of them voted for — as the price of reopening the government.”
Times have modified since Obamacare handed 15 years in the past; “the question of the shutdown is whether the GOP” will now “go on offense” over its failures.
More From Post Editorial Board
Conservative: Dems’ Cruel Food-Stamp Game
If the shutdown continues, the federal government “will run out of funding for food stamps in early November,” but it surely’s “misleading to blame the president and his fellow Republicans,” because the media are doing, argues Tarren Bragdon at The Hill.
Republicans have handed a invoice within the House “that would fully fund the government, including food stamps” aka SNAP.
But “Democrats are blocking” a Senate flooring vote that may go the invoice as a result of “they have a $1.5 trillion wish list” of ridiculous calls for.
“Democrats and their allies are saying that Trump could easily step in to keep” SNAP funded, since his workforce has prevented different cuts “by reallocating money from tariffs.”
But the identical can’t be accomplished for SNAP, as a result of the “spending is far bigger.”
Dems are cynically utilizing “food stamp recipients as leverage to extract concessions from Republicans.”
Get opinions and commentary from our columnists
Subscribe to our day by day Post Opinion e-newsletter!
Thanks for signing up!
Culture critic: Nihilistic Extremist Firestarter
Jonathan Rinderknecht “hiked into the Santa Monica Mountains” the place he allegedly began what would grow to be “the much bigger Palisades fire — the most disastrous blaze” in Los Angeles historical past, groans Peter Savodik at The Free Press.
He’s a kind “increasingly familiar to Americans: young, angry, rudderless, very online, very political, but whose agenda was difficult to discern,” certainly he’s “defined more by what he was against — climate change, Donald Trump,” carnivores, believers in God — “than what he was for.”
He match “a new category of criminal: What the FBI called Nihilistic Violent Extremists.”
Later arrested “for ‘maliciously’ starting the Palisades fire,” Rinderknect had developed a “curdling” worldview the place “his hopes for a better future succumbed to his fears of climate apocalypse.”
Republican: Fringe Dominates Democratic Party
“The fringe has gone mainstream” in Illinois’ Democratic Party, warns Richard Porter at RealClearPolitics.
A “substantial minority” helps “political violence (including felonies to stop federal immigration officers)”; 80% say President Trump and his supporters are “Nazis,” per a new M3 Strategies ballot.
Millions reject “the primacy of federal law” established by the Constitution.
Gov. JB Pritzker, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson and others who declare Illinois will be a “safe haven” from federal law and the 42% of Dems who say violence towards federal officers will be acceptable are “essentially advocating for organized insurrection.”
It “should give pause to Americans of good faith”: The Democratic Party’s leaders “are playing to a base” that’s more and more “alienated” from different Americans — and “hate those who disagree.”
From the fitting: Obama the Albatross
Barack Obama, “believing he still has the influence to sway voters on the campaign trail,” is “stepping up his visibility” in key races, smirks The Washington Times’ Kelly Sadler, although his “mansplaining” and “scolding” of black males particularly “didn’t move the needle” in 2024, and Democrats’ “gamble” that he can enhance them now “may backfire.”
His speeches have “become less inspiring and more condescending and patronizing,” whereas his coverage legacy “didn’t result in a better America.”
And he did nothing to “build up a new generation of Democratic leaders,” as a substitute “obliterating the party.”
Obama “paved the way for Trump’s ascendancy,” however stays “too arrogant” to think about his position within the equation.
— Compiled by The Post Editorial Board
