Ex-JPMorgan banker Chirayu Rana dealt second major – Business News
Ex-JPMorgan banker Chirayu Rana can not stay nameless in his explosive intercourse slave lawsuit towards a feminine government on the bank, a choose ruled Tuesday — the most recent major blow to his legal case which got here simply hours after his lawyer made strikes to drop him as a shopper.
“The case law makes it really clear,” stated Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Dakota D. Ramseur. “You can’t put the genie back in the bottle.”
Chirayu Rana’s lawyer dropped him simply hours earlier than a court docket listening to. Sage Mount
The ruling got here after Rana’s high-powered lawyer, Daniel Kaiser dropped his shopper, saying that they had mutually agreed to “finish their partnership. William Farrington for NY Post
Rana’s identification was revealed by The Post after he filed the swimsuit towards Lorna Hajdini and America’s greatest bank earlier this month. But formally, he was “John Doe” and was looking for to stay nameless as a result of he claimed to be a sufferer of intercourse harassment and assault.
The ruling got here after Rana’s high-powered lawyer, Daniel Kaiser dropped his shopper, saying that they had mutually agreed to “end their partnership.”
Lawyers for Hadjini and JPMorgan argued that Rana has participated in press protection — and claimed he employed a disaster PR firm.
Keeping Rana’s identification secret would even be “prejudicial” to their purchasers — permitting to Hajdini and JPMorgan’s names “to be continued to be dragged through the mud,” Hajdini’s lawyer, Melissa Rodriguez argued.
It would even be more durable to argue Hajdini’s defamation counterclaims, which she filed final week.
“The cat’s out of the bag,” stated Rodriguez. “My client…cannot proceed to clear her name,” she stated in reference to a last-minute 60-day adjournment requested by Kaiser at 9:50 a.m. on the day of the listening to.
“The public should be permitted to know what is going on.”
Rana’s lawyer, Kaiser, had sought to delay the ruling, however the choose denied the request on the grounds that Kaiser’s submitting didn’t embrace the title of a new lawyer.
Ramseur pressed Kaiser in regards to the request for his shopper to proceed to be named “John Doe” in his case towards Lorna Hajdini, as he had been in earlier filings.
Appearing resigned and unprepared, Kaiser declined to quote any particular instances the place a particular person was permitted to stay nameless regardless of the world already realizing his title, arguing that the character of the allegations needs to be adequate to allow his confidentiality in court docket filings.
“I’m not aware of one,” Kaiser conceded, citing no case law or precedent supporting his request, however argued future confidentiality should still be protected as soon as “interest will fade” within the case.
Rodriguez argued that his lawsuit was so detailed, with names of tasks and supervisors, that “any reporter could figure out who they were talking about.”
Lorna Hajdini is suing disgraced former banker Chirayu Rana for defamation. Linkedin
Attorneys for JPM and Hajdini argued that it might be unfair to have their names printed alongside the salacious allegations whereas he’s afforded particular privileges.
“But it doesn’t end there, your honor. The plaintiff himself has spoken with the media publicly,” citing an interview final week in The Juggernaut about his life story.
“Prior to that, plaintiff had engaged a crisis management firm that also spoke publicly and disclosed his name to various media outlets,” Rodriguez stated.
“Ms. Hajdini would be severely prejudiced if the plaintiff is allowed to continue to proceed on a Doe basis,” she argued.
Judge Ramseur additionally pushed for Rana, the bank and Hajdini to settled the case out of court docket.
Sources beforehand informed The Post that JPMorgan had provided Rana $1 million to drop his claims — which the bank known as “fabricated.”
“I do want to encourage on the record that everyone talk to their respective clients to the extent that they can and find out what, if anything, can make this case resolve itself,” she stated.
Rana has claimed he was subjected to a sustained marketing campaign of sexual coercion and racial degradation whereas management ignored his complaints, and that Hajdini threatened to slash his bonus until he agreed to grow to be her “sex slave.”
Neither Rana nor Hajdini attended the hourlong listening to.
The subsequent court docket date within the case is set for June 23
