JPMorgan slams Chiraya Rana’s sexual assault – Business News
JPMorgan Chase slammed disgraced banker Chirayu Rana’s explosive sexual assault allegations in a court docket submitting — and denied his claims that he was a deal-closing celebrity whose work was pitched on to CEO Jamie Dimon.
Rana, the nameless “John Doe” accuser who was completely unmasked by The Post, sparked a Wall Street scandal when he filed his lawsuit final month, accusing high-flying government Lorna Hajdini of threatening to slash his bonus until he agreed to turn into her “sex slave.”
He claimed he was subjected to a sustained marketing campaign of sexual coercion and racial degradation whereas management ignored his complaints.
Rana left his job at Bregal Sagemount on April 2, simply over three weeks earlier than his bombshell lawsuit. Sage Mount
But in a 68-page missive filed late on Thursday in Manhattan Supreme Court, the bank rejected just about each declare made by “John Doe” — the identical day as Hajdini’s legal professionals filed displays that confirmed death threats and different abusive emails she has obtained since Rana’s lawsuit went public.
The bank slammed his claims in opposition to Hajdini as “false” and “malicious”, whereas pouring scorn on Rana’s portrayal of himself as a top-tier banker whose obvious brilliance caught the attention of the lender’s prime leaders.
“Plaintiff asserts a series of sensational, false, and misleading allegations that do not reflect the reality of his employment,” the bank’s legal professionals at Winston & Strawn added, including that JPMC intends to pursue its own claims in opposition to the plaintiff because the case proceeds.
The Post has approached a spokesman for Rana for remark. A JP Morgan spokesperson declined to touch upon the submitting however stated the firm has no intention of settling the matter, noting that the bank has maintained from the outset that the allegations are with out benefit.
New York lawyer Jason Goldman stated: “The bank specifically calling out Rana’s filings and accusations as malicious is in line with Hajdini’s recent defamation countersuit.”
One half of Rana’s lawsuit claimed he was “both knowledgeable and capable” and had earned the casual title of “senior Investment banker” after closing more offers than anybody else on JPMorgan’s leveraged finance workforce.
Hajdini filed her own countersuit on Tuesday, as first reported by The Post. Linkedin
That half of his bombshell submitting additionally stated he was tapped to develop non-public credit and direct lending proposals that his superiors “presented directly to JPMC’s Executive Committee and Chief Executive Officer, Jamie Dimon.”
The Wall Street giant was unequivocally blunt in its response, stating merely: “JPMorgan denies the allegations in this paragraph.”
The bank additionally disputed that Hajdini was even Doe’s direct supervisor, a foundational ingredient of his harassment claims, as The Post beforehand reported.
Start your day with all you need to know
Morning Report delivers the newest information, videos, pictures and more.
Thanks for signing up!
JPMorgan’s legal workforce additionally used its reply to introduce particulars it says undercut Rana’s credibility completely.
It stated the now-unemployed money man informed his bosses that he needed time away as a result of his father was sick, prompting flowers and well-wishes from the workforce.
It not directly referred to an unique story by the New York Post that confirmed that the 35-year-old’s father was, in truth, alive.
Rana’s legal professionals and reps have doubled down on his claims since he was unmasked by The Post. TikTok/@dudesinsuitsnyc
After one of this outlet’s reporters spoke to the elder Rana, the ex-banker’s lawyer later revised the story to confer with the passing of a “dad-like figure.”
“These misrepresentations and evolving facts are not isolated,” the bank wrote. “They reflect a broader pattern of shifting narratives.”
JPMorgan additionally pushed back on Doe’s account of his departure, saying he resigned voluntarily.
They contradicted allegations within the lurid initial grievance that he was successfully compelled out by means of retaliation and positioned on involuntary administrative go away after submitting a discrimination grievance in May 2025.
The bank did affirm a number of primary info: that Rana had joined the firm in March 2024, that Hajdini had joined the identical workforce in April 2024, that the 2 attended a dinner at a non-public social membership and a live performance at Barclays Center with colleagues, and that he had been positioned on paid administrative go away in June 2025.
On the allegations that nameless callers harassed the one-time scholar basketball participant with racial threats after he got here ahead, JPMorgan stated it may neither affirm nor deny that the calls occurred, however firmly denied any connection to the bank or its staff.
