NYC-sponsored political debates skew the political – Latest News
In one other signal of how New York City’s election guidelines favor the left, the moderators of the televised debates overseen by the Campaign Finance Board have clearly skewed the dialogue away from the points that matter to most New Yorkers.
Casual viewers of the two Democratic mayoral debates couldn’t help however come away with the impression that “fighting President Trump” and “protecting illegal immigrants” are City Charter-mandated mayoral duties.
They’re not, of course — nor are they the high precedence of most registered Democrats, who care a lot more about good public colleges, protected streets and subways and the painful value of residing on this city.
You can maybe blame the candidates for how the dialogue of “affordability” devolved into shouting about metropolis authorities controlling rents and changing non-public builders as the prime source of new housing, however the moderators plainly drink the similar progressive Kool-aid on these points.
The Public Advocate debate additionally featured “scenarios” steeped in progressive framing, e.g.: “A family of four in The Bronx is behind on their rent and they’re facing eviction; there are not enough free lawyers to represent them in housing court.”
Another targeted on “the mother of a young man who’s being held on Rikers Island says her son is wasting away” as “his mental health is deteriorating”; a third, on the wants of an undocumented-immigrant household.
More From Post Editorial Board
These hot-button progressive issues have no relation to the issues of most New Yorkers.
Missing: Voters’ anger over the deaths of youngsters below the gaze of the metropolis Administration for Children’s Services, fears over shootings involving gangbanging teenagers; anger over colleges that don’t train.
If future debates are to serve the wants of average New Yorkers, they need to regulate for the truth that almost all native media sorts share the prejudices and obsessions of the progressive elite.
