SCOTUS’ unanimous discrimination call is a huge | Latest News

Date:

SCOTUS’ unanimous discrimination call is a huge – Latest News

Banner Ad


The Supreme Court simply scored a large win for equal safety below the law — slamming the lefty concept that discrimination solely goes a method.

The justices ruled unanimously that Ohio courts have been unsuitable to throw out Marlean Ames’ employment-discrimination case just because she’s not a minority.

Ames alleged she’d been handed over for a promotion at Ohio’s Department of Youth Services in favor of a less-qualified lesbian, then demoted and changed with an also-unfit homosexual man.

Two decrease courts spiked her case, claiming that a straight girl needed to offer more proof of unfair therapy to show she had an “unusual employer who discriminates against the majority.”

Lefties and legacy media scoffed at Ames’ case as a “reverse discrimination” lawsuit — as if “discrimination” usually refers solely to unfair therapy of minorities.

This all follows the left’s “oppressor vs oppressed” dichotomy, through which you’re ever-more-inherently villainous should you’re straight, white, male, able-bodied, wealthy, and many others.: Anyone who ticks fewer of these containers than you mechanically can’t discriminate in opposition to you as a result of they’ve much less “systemic power.”

More From Post Editorial Board

All 9 Justices ripped that argument aside.

Indeed, liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote that disparate-treatment law on “draws no distinctions between majority-group plaintiffs and minority-group plaintiffs. Congress left no room for courts to impose special requirements on majority-group plaintiffs alone.”

There is no “reverse discrimination”: solely discrimination, no modifiers needed.

Get opinions and commentary from our columnists

Subscribe to our every day Post Opinion publication!

Thanks for signing up!

This is one more huge blow to the DEI industry, which is all about mandating that racist box-ticking mentality.

Which absolutely why the standard suspects nonetheless referred to as the ruling “divisive” and/or President Trump’s fault — as if a 9-0 resolution in some way left any room for confusion.

Kudos to the justices for upholding the plain and easy reality: The Civil Rights Act protects all people from discrimination based mostly on race, shade, faith, intercourse, or national origin — not simply those that the left sees as victims.

That’s actual equality.

Clickable Banner
CWP (Crypto Work Pro)
CWP (Crypto Work Pro)https://www.cryptoworkpro.net
Hi, I’m a passionate cryptocurrency enthusiast with 10 years of experience in the world of digital currencies. I’ve always been fascinated by blockchain technology and the potential of decentralized finance (DeFi) to reshape the financial landscape. I share insights, tips, and strategies to help others navigate the fast-paced world of crypto.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Why California Democrats like socialism | Latest News

Why California Democrats like socialism - Latest News What...

Mikie Sherril’s still ducking on New Jersey’s | Latest News

Mikie Sherril's still ducking on New Jersey's - Latest...

‘Rape leaflets’ for migrants enrage the UK — and | Latest News

'Rape leaflets' for migrants enrage the UK — and...

Another California train is late — not just | Latest News

Another California train is late — not just -...

Why won’t the Times name ALL the thieves it has | Latest News

Why won't the Times name ALL the thieves it...

Why moderate Democrats seem like such a hopeless | Latest News

Why moderate Democrats seem like such a hopeless -...

The Gwyneth Paltrow AI controversy only hurts | Latest News

The Gwyneth Paltrow AI controversy only hurts - Latest...

Lindsay Clancy isn’t a monster — she’s proof of | Latest News

Lindsay Clancy isn't a monster — she's proof of...