The left puts out another smear campaign against – Latest News
They can’t help themselves.
Even on the twenty fifth anniversary of 9/11, the leftist media mob reached into its baggage of soiled methods to smear New York and the White House.
In a day that reeked of fact-free protection, politicians with press passes found rampant hate and prejudice against Muslims in Gotham.
They additionally accused President Trump of utilizing the day of infamy as a flimsy excuse for the struggle against Iran.
My solely shock is that I’m nonetheless stunned by the shoddy methods.
Long earlier than the newest dive into the sewer, it was clear that details don’t matter when left-wing outfits have a narrative to sell.
More From Michael Goodwin
Naturally, the culprits peddling these lies are led by The New York Times.
In a particular part of Friday’s version supposedly dedicated to the twenty fifth anniversary of the deadliest day in American historical past, the wizards working the outlet thought it was a good time to announce a long story underneath a single phrase: “Islamophobia.”
The weird concoction includes two writers twisting actuality past recognition to achieve a blatantly false conclusion.
Namely, that regardless of the election of town’s first Muslim mayor final yr, Zohran Mamdani, “anti Muslim prejudice endures, echoing the Islamophobia that arose in the earliest days after Sept. 11.”
The declare is up to now off the mark that it ought to be flagged as fiction.
There was no wave of Islamophobia after Sept. eleventh, neither is there one now.
Yet the story insists that, with out details or statistics, that the Sept. 11 assaults “left many Muslims scarred by heavy-handed law enforcement tactics and the suspicion if not outright hostility of classmates, co-workers, elected officials and cable news commentators.”
Ignoring details
In different phrases, New York is chock-full of bigots.
The broadside recollects Hillary Clinton’s smear concerning the nation brimming with “deplorables.”
It’s all wishful pondering by the Democratic Party and race-baiters who’ve destroyed the credibility of the once-great Times.
Here are the important thing numbers the story ignores.
Jews, who make up about 9 % of % of town’s population, had been focused in 181 hate crimes within the first half of 2026, or about 56% of all such crimes reported by the NYPD.
Although Muslims make up about 12 %% of people within the 5 boroughs, they had been the reported targets in simply 17 hate crimes during the primary half of this yr, in keeping with the NYPD, or much less than 1 %%.
The option to ignore inconvenient details illustrates how the Times shapes the information to suit its opinions. Its flip against Israel was obvious within the false costs that the Jewish state was committing genocide and ravenous kids during the struggle in Gaza — a struggle began by Hamas.
And the paper, in defending an indefensible Nicholas Kristof column, embraced the nutty concept that Israel skilled canines to rape Palestinian prisoners.
Scientific researchers scoffed, however the paper doesn’t trust science when it undercuts the popular narrative that Muslims are perpetual victims.
Then again, maybe anyone within the chain of command was embarrassed by the Friday travesty.
That’s as a result of Saturday’s version carried an article that, with out saying so instantly, neutered the declare of rampant Islamophobia.
The Saturday headline declared that “As Antisemitism Rises, Jewish Institutions Strengthen Security.”
It recounts how Jewish establishments have spent “millions on additional security protections in recent years amid a rise in antisemitic incidents.”
It quotes NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch saying “antisemitic hate crimes are up 9 percent so far this year,” and provides that “more than half of confirmed hate crimes this year have targeted Jewish New Yorkers.”
It cites no numbers or examples of anti-Muslim hate crimes.
It does nevertheless acknowledge two latest examples of antisemitic crimes: One in August when a man was charged after he barged into providers at Central Synagogue in midtown and hit two people earlier than he was arrested.
The second crime concerned “a handful of synagogues and Jewish community centers in Forest Hills, Queens, [that] were vandalized with antisemitic graffiti.”
Get opinions and commentary from our columnists
Subscribe to our day by day Post Opinion e-newsletter!
Thanks for signing up!
Violence vs. suspicion
The article makes no point out of the supposed wave of Islamophobia after 9/11 or now, as if the accusations in Friday’s paper didn’t exist — or no longer mattered.
Additionally, it’s noteworthy that the Times employed a double normal of reporting in its contrasting articles.
The anti-Jewish acts concerned precise violence and vandalism.
On the opposite hand, the supposed flood of Islamophobia is centered on the emotions and suspicions of Muslims however not prison incidents.
If it weren’t for double requirements, the Gray Lady wouldn’t have any requirements in any respect.
Another media concocted charge that surfaced over the twenty fifth anniversary includes the assertion that Trump and his staff are falsely linking the struggle in Iran to the 9/11 assaults.
This one is the brainchild of the Democratic shills at Politico, The Washington Post, The Hill and others.
As Politico put it, Trump and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth “used remarks commemorating the 25th anniversary of Sept. 11 to draw a parallel between the terror attacks that killed nearly 3,000 Americans and the ongoing U.S. war with Iran.”
After noting that 184 people had been killed on the Pentagon on 9/11, it stories that Hegseth mentioned the US “still faces enemies seeking to inflict harm on Americans, and portrayed the Iran war as part of the continued U.S. fight against terrorism.”
Well, he’s proper on each circumstances!
The Hill struck a equally hostile tone, saying Trump and Hegseth “tied the Iran war to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks . . . suggesting the conflict is a continuation of the war on terror.”
The navel gazers’ insinuation that there’s no precise relationship is absurd.
Trump has mentioned since his 2016 campaign that Iran should not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon as a result of it has threatened to make use of it against America and Israel.
Especially in his second time period, he burdened his need for a negotiated settlement, however reluctantly turned to the army after the mullahs’ negotiators declared that they had enough enriched uranium to make 11 weapons.
As Trump envoy Steve Witkoff mentioned publicly, these Iranian officers advised him and Jared Kushner that enriching uranium was an worldwide proper they’d by no means give up.
Trump clearly was reluctant to go to struggle however did in order a final resort, making the Iran battle a clear continuation of the struggle on terror that began after 9/11.
The solely option to clarify the media failure to see the connection is that it’s intentional.
The Washington gatekeepers are among the many thousands and thousands of people who don’t just like the struggle, however by injecting their opinion into their protection, they’re distorting that protection.
And but they surprise why so few people nonetheless trust them.
