Trump 15% cap on grant costs will spark the reform – Latest News
For one other instance of how the judicial “resistance” to Team Trump reforms manages to grab the ethical low ground, contemplate federal Judge Angel Kelley’s blocking of a 15% cap on taxpayer protection of “indirect costs” tacked on to National Institutes of Health grants for college analysis.
Kelley (a Biden appointee, natch) complains this could be disruptive — but this rip-off cries out for disruption.
President Donald Trump provides a thumbs up to the crowd during the Division I Men’s Wrestling Championship on March 22. IMAGN IMAGES by way of Reuters Connect
Look at one ongoing research by Harvard prof Elizabeth Janiak, which seeks to take a look at “societal dynamics of power and oppression” round abortion via an “intersectional framework.”
For that, taxpayers shelled out a hair more than $495,000, of which about $168,000 was for “indirect” costs, which supposedly cowl Havard’s overhead to undergird Janiak’s analysis.
That’s an additional 51 “indirect” cents on each “direct” greenback (i.e. the money paying for the precise science) — and oblique costs aren’t even itemized, so there’s no telling in any respect how Harvard truly spends the windfall.
More From Post Editorial Board
How a lot sensible help does she need for a “framework” view of “societal dynamics”?
Maybe Harvard is shopping for gold-plated dream-catchers, or simply perhaps it’s milking the NIH as a result of it may.
Fine, it’ll be a impolite awakening for Harvard to lose out on (some) free money.
But the 15% rule shouldn’t even pressure it to dip into its endowment of $50 billion and growing.
Heck, personal contracts for college analysis usually permit nothing for “indirect costs.”
Fight the woke academy
Subscribe to our each day Post Opinion e-newsletter!
Thanks for signing up!
As Matt Taibbi’s current Post column famous, these faculties are mega-rich, usually with billions in “cash reserves” on prime of their endowments.
We’re all in favor of taxpayer funding for precise scientific analysis, however this system is plainly past damaged.
And was even earlier than the Great Awokening noticed our elite scientists completely prostitute themselves to adapt with lefty politics round race, gender, COVID and the whole lot else, incinerating the public’s trust (as witness the abortion research cited above).
Insanely, the shameless “science” bros are nonetheless at it: A rally on March 7 noticed former NIH head Francis Collins and others screaming for more, more, more tax {dollars} whilst they continued to push their DEI agenda.
Let the daylight in, stop soaking on a regular basis Americans and remind our comrade academicians simply whose pursuits they’re purported to be utilizing these fed bucks to advance.
