College-sports bill’s killer flaw, Ceuta could be – Latest News
Decency desk: College-Sports Bill’s Killer Flaw
The National Collegiate Athletic Association promotes “the Protect College Sports Act” as the reply to its “college football, conference realignment and name-image-and-likeness” issues.
But “the NCAA and its lobbyists aren’t telling anyone” that the invoice “is a Trojan horse for men in women’s college sports,” thunders Kim Jones at The Wall Street Journal.
One provision would stymie federal lawsuits to guard girls’s sports activities, “halt efforts to hold the NCAA accountable under Title IX” and undo “state protections for women and girls in school sports.”
Don’t trust the NCAA, which “permits member schools to allow men on women’s teams” and “allows men to define themselves as women and use women’s locker rooms.”
America’s “female athletes deserve the full protections of Title IX.” “Solve football, solve NIL, but don’t exempt the NCAA from Title IX and state law.”
More From Post Editorial Board
Conservatives: Ceuta Could Be Our Future
The border rush at Ceuta — “tens of thousands of military-aged men invaded” the Spanish exclave — reveals what “the Democratic Socialists of America’s mass-amnesty and open-borders policies would look like in practice,” warns the Washington Examiner’s editorial board.
Spain’s socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has considerably “implemented” the dream of “mass amnesty and open borders” shared by the Western left on the premise that “we owe migrants the right to come here” as a result of capitalism “supposedly destroyed their countries’ economies” — when in reality it was “socialist policies” that “condemned their own people to misery.”
Socialists now search to “import that misery” wholesale, which is what occurs when “governments transform border enforcement from a sovereign obligation into an exercise in ideological guilt.”
Get opinions and commentary from our columnists
Subscribe to our day by day Post Opinion publication!
Thanks for signing up!
From the suitable: Make Dems Own Their Insanity
Rather than “panic,” Republicans within the midterms ought to undertake a “bold branding campaign, without apology,” argues The Washington Times’ Robert Knight.
Recall the horrors below President Joe Biden, when gasoline was “$5 a gallon, inflation soared as high as 9%, millions of unvetted illegals poured across the border,” and Iran was simply weeks from “getting the bomb.”
“The message: If you vote Democratic at any level, you are summoning back the bad old days,” and “you are also enabling Democratic Socialists of America” and their “bizarre, anti-American agenda.”
GOP advertisements ought to “illustrate the stark moral contrast between the parties,” from Dem-enabled “billions of dollars in fraud” to lunatic pro-trans propaganda to Kindergartners to Democrats’ embrace of antisemitic America-hater Hasan Piker, who claimed America deserved 9/11. “Make the Democrats own it all.”
Pollsters: Progressive Lifeline for GOP
Rep. Haley Stevens and Abdul El-Sayed’s battle for Michigan’s Democratic Senate nomination is “the most contentious primary of the 2026 cycle,” notice Douglas E. Schoen & Carly Cooperman in The Hill, and a Dem win within the fall “is vital to the party’s chances to retake” the Senate.
Uh-oh: “El-Sayed appears to be gaining considerable momentum in the campaign’s final days,” however has struggled to gain reputation amongst “Independents and Black voters, two vital demographics in Michigan.”
Surveys show him trailing Republican Mike Rogers by 10 factors, whereas “Stevens and Rogers are virtually tied.”
So the possible progressive major victory will increase “the odds that progressives will have won the battle only to cost Democrats the war.”
Libertarian: Zo’s Bogus ‘Enemies List’ Excuse
Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s “packaged publication of surcharge targets” is “potentially dangerous,” however his supporters are defending him by saying “tax and property information” is public, fumes Reason’s J.D. Tuccille.
The uncooked knowledge is, however this chosen checklist has been compiled into a search-friendly file, which is a entire completely different factor.
And the tax hits condos and coops valued at $1 million; by NYC requirements “those owners are not necessarily the richest of the rich at all. But they’re prosperous enough to stir the socialist mayor’s backers into a frenzy of envy, which is probably the intention.”
In our “age of weaponized hatreds, just being suspected of success can get you on politicians’ enemy lists.”
— Compiled by The Post Editorial Board
