In California, public safety loses to sanctuary – Latest News
A triple murder is dedicated, allegedly by somebody the system had a number of alternatives to take away however selected not to, due to deliberate noncooperation by California. Families are shattered. The group is mourning. We have each proper to call this merely outrageous.
This isn’t misfortune. It’s coverage malpractice with a physique rely.
And it completely embodies the indefensible standoff between California’s feel-good sanctuary model and precise federal immigration law.
As of early this yr, DHS reported that sanctuary jurisdictions in California had launched over 4,500 people with energetic ICE detainers since Jan. 20, 2025 –– together with people with convictions or fees for murder, sexual offenses, assault, drug trafficking, and weapons crimes.
And it completely embodies the indefensible standoff between California’s feel-good sanctuary model and precise federal immigration law. James Keivom
Joaquin Escoto, accused of slaying an toddler and two ladies in Modesto, suits the profile of a repeat offender the federal authorities sought to take away.
California’s excuse for defying the feds? “Building trust” and “not turning cops into immigration agents.”
The sensible outcome? Shielding repeat offenders like Escoto, who had already been thrown out of the nation thrice.
The law in California makes enforcement more durable by design, when utilized to repeat deportees with felony data.
Honoring a easy ICE notification request after a DUI arrest for somebody already faraway from this nation thrice is just not “mass deportation” or household separation theater.
Joaquin Escoto, accused of slaying an toddler and two ladies in Modesto, suits the profile of a repeat offender the federal authorities sought to take away. stocktonchronicle
It is primary coordination of public safety between sovereign ranges of authorities on a matter of federal authority.
And California is just not being obliged to implement federal law. On the opposite, the state actively obstructs it and withholds routine public-safety info.
There is no ethical or sensible excuse for shielding somebody like Escoto from federal removing after repeated re-entries and felony exercise.
Sign up for the California Morning Report e-newsletter
California’s prime information, sports activities and leisure delivered to your inbox on daily basis.
Thanks for signing up!
Shouting “protect immigrants” loses credibility when it shields people who prey on weak people, typically in those self same immigrant communities.
At rallies, mantras like “F—k ICE”, and “ICE out of California” chants from activists, unions, academics, college students, and politicians, mirror an ideological absolutism that treats all enforcement as illegitimate, and views any cooperation with ICE as ethical treason.
This mindset has actual victims, clearly.
And California is just not being obliged to implement federal law. On the opposite, the state actively obstructs it and withholds routine public-safety info. AP Photo/Andres Kudacki
The Trump administration calls this what it’s: a deliberate safety racket for felony aliens on the expense of American lives.
California’s response? More legal guidelines, to tie ICE’s palms tighter.
Ditto in Los Angeles, the place on Saturday, Councilwoman and mayoral candidate Nithya Raman boasted on X of her plan “to make LA the strongest sanctuary city in the country.”
Under the Supremacy Clause, immigration is squarely the federal authorities’s turf. Congress has the facility right here, and statutes like 8 U.S.C. § 1373 exist exactly to stop states from blocking native cops from speaking to ICE.
Download The California Post App, observe us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters
California Post News: Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, YouTube, WhatsApp, LinkedIn
California Post Sports Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X
California Post Opinion
California Post Newsletters: Sign up right here!
California Post App: Download right here!
Home supply: Sign up right here!
Page Six Hollywood: Sign up right here!
Yet California’s sanctuary legal guidelines flip native jails into revolving doorways.
The state prohibits the honoring of ICE detainers with out a judicial warrant, blocks routine notifications, and forbids the use of any state assets to help take away people the feds need gone.
California has, by way of a supermajority Democratic Legislature and screw-loose Gov. Gavin Newsom, weaponized sanctuary safety into energetic sabotage.
And criminals, as a substitute of dealing with deportation, are set free in California to offend again.
Yet California’s sanctuary legal guidelines flip native jails into revolving doorways. AP
Federal supremacy on immigration meets state-level nullification.
The Trump administration’s funding pressures and enforcement surges are the predictable backlash. And courts keep slapping down federal actions, so the stalemate continues, with victims piling up.
Defenders nonetheless trot out the same old, drained script: “Overall immigrant crime is low,” “these cases are rare,” “due process matters.” Tell that to the surviving little one of this triple homicide.
When sanctuary coverage intentionally blocks handoffs to the feds of recognized repeat offenders, you don’t get to wave it away as “unfortunate coincidence.”
There is no excuse.
There is no severe protection.
This isn’t “protecting immigrants.” It’s defending criminals like Escoto from penalties and accountability beneath federal law.
This is sanctuary extremism –– not compassionate governance, however performative ideology with deadly penalties.
While California’s political and activist lessons pat themselves on the back for sticking it to ICE, hard-working Americans watch households get destroyed and marvel why primary public safety retains dropping to open-border theater.
Richie Greenberg is a political commentator based mostly in San Francisco.
