Jaxson Dart’s critics: Letters – Latest News
The Issue: Criticism of Giants quarterback Jaxson Dart for introducing President Trump at a rally.
Giants Quarterback Jaxson Dart reveals his help for President Trump; Paul Schwartz says Dart is “not a finished product” and may rethink (“Misaction of Jaxson,” Sports, May 24).
I don’t recall Schwartz or any sports activities reporters calling out any athlete for publicly supporting President Barack Obama or another Democratic politician, as many did.
Joe Nicoletti
Pompton Lakes, NJ
Dart launched President Trump at a New York rally, which is his proper.
He wasn’t talking as a Giants consultant.
This was solely his level of view.
Unlike the numerous NFL gamers who took a knee after the George Floyd incident, Dart just isn’t forcing his political opinion on the followers or his teammates.
Unfortunately, our society has allowed for celebrities and athletes who help Trump to be scorned.
Instead of asking the critics why they relentlessly attempt to destroy somebody with an opposing level of view, perhaps it’s time for fair- minded people to ask: Why have we allowed this to proceed?
It is definite that if Dart have been a Democrat, he could be applauded.
I like this younger man for taking a stand.
Irene Hesse
Mineola
After studying Abdul Carter’s quote criticizing Jaxson Dart for introducing the president at an occasion, I can’t help questioning about Carter’s outrage upon listening to about how many soccer gamers are arrested for a plethora of critical, heinous and careless crimes — typically instances with victims severely harmed.
Bill DePaolo
Elizabeth, NJ
It is a unhappy state of affairs when introducing the president of the United States (no matter who he’s) is a matter for controversy, a lot much less venom.
In what universe does disagreeing with the president’s insurance policies imply we’ve to sentence those that agree with them?
Gary Markman
Beacon Falls, Conn.
Schwartz crossed the road together with his clearly biased article.
Just take a have a look at the overwhelming chastising feedback and posts he obtained.
Someone ought to have a phrase with him about future one-sidedness.
There are two sides to a coin, not solely his aspect.
Joe Fernandez
Miami, Fla.
Get opinions and commentary from our columnists
Subscribe to our every day Post Opinion publication!
Thanks for signing up!
The Issue: Mayor Mamdani’s plan to grab privately owned buildings from negligent landlords.
Our communist Mayor Mamdani has vowed to make use of metropolis funds to strip properties from landlords for power neglect (“Zoh’s War on Housing,” Editorial, May 27).
I counsel that the primary properties that he steals and presents to “responsible stewards” be the NYCHA buildings that he’s liable for.
The residents there have undoubtedly been chronically uncared for.
Christopher O’Keefe
Manhattan
How do you engineer a authorities takeover of housing?
You freeze the rents, whereas not freezing the bills, so the homeowners can’t afford to keep up their properties.
The authorities then has the idea to declare the homeowners as “unfit,” permitting politicians to grab their property, taking control themselves or giving it to “nonprofits” linked to the Democratic machine.
This is how Mamdani achieves his dream of “de-commodifying” housing.
The similar people liable for NYCHA will then degrade all property in New York.
That’s what the “warmth of collectivism” is all about.
Gary Mottola
Brooklyn
Instead of seizing property from personal landlords, Mamdani ought to repair public housing, which is in an ongoing state of disrepair.
But no, that wouldn’t match his socialist, communist strategy.
Michael Horowitz
Fresh Meadows
Want to weigh in on as we speak’s tales? Send your ideas (alongside together with your full title and metropolis of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters are subject to enhancing for readability, size, accuracy, and elegance.
