Kamala Harris’ flaws on full display during her – Latest News
Kamala Harris is on a ridiculous 15-city “international” guide tour, during which she tells the gullible girls who line up for hours to see her that she solely missed out on being president by a whisker.
She claims that 2024 was the “closest presidential election in the 21st century.”
Everyone is aware of that is a “lie,” as Donald Trump stated in a heated Truth Social post, itemizing the small print of his “LANDSLIDE!” victory. He gained the Electoral College by 312 to 226, gained counties nationwide by 2,600 to 525, gained all seven swing states and gained the favored vote by hundreds of thousands.
Harris’ declare that she virtually gained is Biden-level delusion. It’s a cheap assumption that she is utilizing her self-justifying “107 Days” and guide tour with cameo appearances by the likes of Hillary Clinton as a springboard for one more kamikaze run for the White House.
But final week, when requested level clean onstage in Washington, DC, whether or not she could be a presidential candidate in 2028, she was coy: “Maybe, maybe not.”
Maybe not, methinks.
Harris’ flaws as a candidate have been on full display in her guide tour — the inappropriate laughing like a hyena, the painfully inarticulate phrase salad, the always shifting accents and impacts. It’s clear that is a particular person with no concrete sense of self, a lady who has been gifted massive jobs and flubbed each one.
Dem girls a mess
And, but, the best way the Democratic Party is heading, these impediments could not imply a factor. Blunders and character flaws that might have disabled a candidate simply 10 years in the past are shrugged off and excused, particularly in terms of entitled liberal girls with low shallowness who seemingly can do no unsuitable.
When the repellent Katie Porter, Democrat front-runner within the 2026 California gubernatorial race, was uncovered final week as an unhinged bully with anger-management points in a viral on-air meltdown during a CBS Sacramento interview, the sisterhood rushed to excuse the inexcusable.
Liberal and union luminaries praised the 51-year-old three-time congresswoman as “strong” and “tough” and “the gutsy leader California needs to go toe to toe with Donald Trump.”
Porter was simply “having a menopausal moment,” stated Joy Behar on “The View,” earlier than turning the criticism to Trump. Maybe she’s “having a bad day,” stated her co-host Whoopi Goldberg.
Gee, Porter should have a lot of dangerous days, judging from leaked videos exhibiting her swearing at workers and abusing them for minor transgressions.
She needed to have anger-management courses after dumping a bowl of steaming sizzling potatoes on her ex-husband’s head. The father of her three youngsters subsequently claimed of their divorce that she was liable to “extreme anger,” was “unpredictable and unstable [with] a history of snapping and screaming at [him] and the children.”
Not the type of particular person to whom you need to give huge energy as governor of our richest state, however Porter clearly appeals to the AWFL cohort of Democrat voters: Affluent White Female Liberals.
Another star of the post-Hillary technology of aspiring AWFL leaders is Abigail Spanberger, a former CIA operative who’s front-runner to be Virginia’s subsequent governor.
Disqualifying throughout
While she is more polished than Porter, her refusal to disavow or withdraw her endorsement for Democrat ally Jay Jones recommend a ethical callousness that belies her fastidiously cultivated image as an empathetic lady and mom.
In this assassination period, it ought to have taken each Democrat precisely one millisecond to denounce Jones — who’s operating for AG on the Democratic ticket with Spanberger — and pressure him out of the race after textual content messages have been revealed wherein he expressed violent threats to homicide a Republican rival and his youngsters.
Instead, Dems assume they’ll experience out the scandal.
In a earlier period, older girls used to uphold primary ethical requirements for youthful generations to observe.
But liberals have allotted with such female relics, priding themselves on being even harder and more ruthless than males of their pursuit of energy.
Harris’ sins are more mundane. She was merely a woefully insufficient candidate whose each vapid utterance reminds us that she has been elevated properly past her skills, for causes that aren’t instantly evident.
Get Miranda’s newest take
Sign up for Devine Online, the e-newsletter from Miranda Devine
Thanks for signing up!
But that doesn’t stop her from having an enthusiastic fan base of liberal girls, dubbed the “K-Hive,” who flock to her each public engagement and hold off her each vacuous phrase, even if she has set back the trigger of feminine candidates half a century. Even the VIP “meet and greet” tickets on her guide tour are bought out at $350 a pop, such is the starvation for feminine management on the left.
The girls who lined up exterior DC’s Warner Theatre to listen to Harris converse final week have been a “collage of brat nostalgia and MSNBC #Resistance [folk, wearing] the blazer-jeans-Converse combo,” shopping for marketing campaign buttons that learn, “No Kings in America” and “Anti Trump Grandmas Club,” in response to The Washington Post.
While her guide has been panned for what Bill Maher dubbed its “Everyone Sucks But Me” self-indulgence, it does faucet into the reigning girl-boss narrative of liberal girls: that they’re terribly important and really careworn and the world is there to serve them — particularly males, who should all the time be romantic and supportive and cater to their each whim.
Dastardly to Doug
One scene sums up the perspective.
It’s Harris’ birthday on the marketing campaign path, and she or he is trying ahead to a “special evening” with her husband, Doug Emhoff, in a posh resort in Philadelphia.
“I was wondering what he’d planned for the evening. The simple answer: nothing. Not a thing.” It was her workers who ordered a cake and her girlfriends who despatched flowers.
Poor Doug at the very least gave her a current: an costly designer pearl necklace. But Harris seen the necklace was engraved with the date of their marriage ceremony anniversary, not her birthday.
She was very upset that he had “repurposed” the reward as a substitute of shopping for her a new one and flounced off to soak within the tub.
But when she known as out for a towel, Doug didn’t reply.
Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for unique and candid conversations with essentially the most influential disruptors in Washington. Subscribe right here!
He was watching baseball in one other room and presumably didn’t hear her. So she known as his cellphone.
“His answer: a casual ‘What’s up?’ Really?! It was a bridge too far,” she writes. “And then we got into it . . . It was one of those fights every couple has.”
Ummm, no.
Later, Harris had her staffer, Storm, hand Doug a set of word playing cards and instruct him to jot down apologetic notes “telling me how much he loved me” that might be positioned on the pillow of her resort beds for the rest of the marketing campaign.
Inflated opinions of self-worth aren’t a recipe for concord, in life or in politics.
