Lone juror’s holdout in the Lindsay Clancy trial – Latest News
‘He couldn’t recover from the proven fact that Clancy viciously killed her youngsters.”
Those are the phrases of one of the insufferably condescending feminine jurors from the Lindsay Clancy mistrial who’ve gone public with their disdain for the lone male juror who refused to go together with their not guilty verdict.
Good for him.
Defendant Lindsay Clancy appears at the jury as a mistrial is asserted in her homicide trial on Sept. 4, 2026. USA TODAY Network through Reuters Connect
The youngsters, Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, have been the forgotten victims in this case.
The Massachusetts nurse doesn’t dispute that she strangled her youngsters one after the other on Jan. 24, 2023, with train bands round their necks after she despatched her husband, Patrick, out on an errand.
Patrick returned to his youngsters useless and his spouse bleeding on the snow-covered yard after she cut her wrists and throat and leaped out a bed room window 12 toes above the ground, rendering herself paralyzed from the waist down. Rather than accepting blame, Lindsay, 36, pleaded not guilty, claiming she couldn’t inform proper from fallacious at the time as a result of she was affected by postpartum psychosis, despite the fact that proof for that was skinny.
Withstood strain
A mistrial was referred to as final Friday as a result of the jury of 9 ladies and three males couldn’t agree on a verdict after more than seven days of deliberations so contentious that yelling reportedly could possibly be heard outdoors the room.
Now that a number of of the jurors have come out and uncovered themselves, we will see the immense strain that the lone holdout juror was below day after day in that jury room, being harangued and browbeaten by ladies infuriated that he refused to be persuaded by their self-proclaimed superior knowledge.
Jury forewoman Roni Carlson, a former elementary faculty trainer, Kellie Farina, a chef for a senior middle, and Paula Devlin, who does work for a protection contractor, have been interviewed on digital camera by NBC10 Boston, and it’s exhausting to think about a more smug group missing in self-awareness or any humility. They revealed that there have been a quantity of nurses and academics on the jury.
Three jurors from the Lindsay Clancy homicide trial communicate with NBC10 Boston’s Sue O’Connell on Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2026, as a mistrial was declared in the Clancy case final week. NBC10 Boston
“He was very arrogant,” Devlin mentioned of the holdout. “He did not take anything that anybody said.”
She complained there have been a number of nurses on the jury who took it on themselves to elucidate the toxicology reviews to the holdout juror.
“He tried to ask a question about the medications,” mentioned Devlin. “We had the toxicology report. We may see precisely the quantities. The nurses in the room spoke to that. And talked to that.
Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for unique and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington on ‘Pod Force One.’ Subscribe right here!
“And they spoke to that . . . And he just completely disregarded the information that they gave him.” As was his proper.
Carlson, the forewoman, mentioned she thought they’d received the argument at one level. “He admitted he had reasonable doubt and I started filling out the forms, I was so excited . . . And then he said, ‘But I’m still not going to say that she’s not guilty by reason of insanity.’ ”
As was his proper.
Another girl, Juror No. 5, spoke to CBS Boston anonymously in protection of the holdout:
The jury’s foreperson, Roni Carlson, from the Lindsay Clancy homicide trial is pictured on Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2026, on NBC10 Boston. NBC10 Boston
“The majority of people . . . was very firm in their stance and their beliefs from the beginning . . . The standalone juror was not the only one who refused to see things from the other side so I’m going to defend [him]. There were some big personalities in that room.”
Originally, she thought Lindsay” was guilty and she or he was criminally liable for it, and possibly I nonetheless consider that in a sure manner.” Several different jurors reportedly felt the identical manner however over time have been persuaded to seek out Lindsay not guilty — all however the holdout.
Lawyer’s huge show
The outspoken feminine jurors completely cherished Lindsay’s legal professional, Kevin Reddington, and gushed about how “entertaining” and “compassionate” he was. In their minds he had proved that Lindsay was not a unhealthy mom and she or he “loved her children” and that was all that mattered.
Yet Reddington behaved like an emotional bully, inside and outdoors the courtroom, particularly when he put a goal on the holdout juror, whom he blamed for the mistrial in an prolonged public tantrum outdoors the courtroom on Friday.
“I hope that guy can sleep well at night,” Reddington mentioned. In courtroom he referred to as the identical juror a “liar” and mentioned he “stole seven weeks of the life” of the different jurors,” which is wealthy contemplating that in the total seven-week trial Reddington barely talked about the three total lives stolen from the Clancy youngsters by his shopper.
Lindsay Clancy, left, and her protection legal professional, Kevin Reddington.
Reddington additionally fueled false web rumors that Patrick was concerned in the killing of his own youngsters by refusing to exonerate him when requested and as a substitute praising the TikTok sleuths who’ve damned Patrick.
“I certainly don’t dismiss them. It’s amazing what people on TikTok . . . how they’re able to ferret out facts and they do investigations.”
Reddington should have realized he went too far as a result of this week he appeared on “CBS Mornings” and recanted, saying, “It’s obvious that Patrick was a man who stood by his wife through all of the difficulty. [He] ought to be able to move on with his life.”
Despite Reddington’s flaws, the outspoken feminine jurors most popular him to prosecutors Jennifer Sprague and Shanan Buckingham, whom they criticized as missing “compassion” and being “unprofessional.”
Get Miranda’s newest take
Sign up for Devine Online, the publication from Miranda Devine
Thanks for signing up!
For the youngsters
The prosecutors have been fully skilled. Did Carlson and friends disdain them as a result of of their plump look, as a result of they don’t have time to go to Pilates each morning?
Sprague and Buckingham have 50 years of prosecutorial expertise between them and kids of their own, incomes modest salaries for draining work in youngster safety circumstances. They did their best, though their speedy four-day jury choice leaves one thing to be desired.
Their boss, District Attorney Tim Cruz, who has been defending the 500,000 residents of Plymouth County for the previous 25 years, was heckled relentlessly outdoors the courtroom Friday.
The son of a plumber with youngsters and grandchildren of his own, he’s the longest serving DA in Massachusetts, despite the fact that he’s a Republican in a Democrat-majority space.
Plymouth has road indicators declaring it “America’s Hometown,” since it’s the place the Pilgrims arrived on the Mayflower in 1620 and based the first everlasting European settlement in New England. The prosperous, predominantly white city, which voted for Kamala Harris over Donald Trump by virtually 10 factors in 2024, additionally adopted the slogan “No Place for Hate.”
Officials deserted that title final yr, nevertheless it nonetheless seems on some indicators round city.
In spite of the heckling, Cruz spoke with understated dignity, saying: “I perceive that this has been an emotional trial for everyone . . . But in the finish I convey all of it back to the youngster victims in this case, Cora, Dawson, and Callan . . .
“Children were murdered, and it’s our job to seek justice.”
Justice is important, regardless of emotions. The trial was not nearly Lindsay and her tragedy. It was about the youngsters and precedents set for youngster homicide. Already there are reviews of no less than one copycat homicide.
For the sake of all the different youngsters but to be born, we can not afford to develop into a society that normalizes moms killing their infants.
