Manhattan judge’s ruling against ICE on Rikers is – Latest News
“Null and void,” Judge Mary Rosado lawlessly declared of Mayor Adams’ govt order reopening an ICE workplace on Rikers Island, as she invented an completely new “legal” normal to achieve her desired conclusion.
That is, the issue was an “impermissible appearance of a conflict of interest” as a result of she believes the mayor was merely out to please President Donald Trump.
An look; actuality is apparently irrelevant in Rosado’s chambers.
Get opinions and commentary from our columnists
Subscribe to our day by day Post Opinion publication!
Thanks for signing up!
The City Council sued to dam the order, accusing Adams of a “corrupt bargain” with the Trump White House, but failed to provide a shred of precise proof of any such quid professional quo.
Rosado merely relied on a disgruntled US lawyer’s resignation letter and Adams’ jocular joint televised dialog with border czar Tom Homan.
More From Post Editorial Board
The decide additionally accused the mayor of ignoring guidelines for avoiding conflicts of curiosity and abuse of his workplace, whereas refusing to think about claims the Biden White House had waged lawfare on him after he dared to query its insurance policies that despatched violent transnational gang members flooding into town.
Rosado had already sided twice with the council in quickly blocking the order earlier than Friday’s remaining resolution.
Talk about “junk justice.”
First Deputy Mayor Randy Mastro was level on welcoming ICE back to Rikers; he fumes: “There is no actual conflict of interest, and I acted independently of the mayor. This executive order is about prosecuting violent transnational gangs and ensuring the safety of law-abiding immigrants.”
The metropolis’s interesting; greater state courts actually ought to reverse Rosado’s fact-free “fact-finding,” lest they increase the political weaponization of justice in New York.
Indeed, a practical justice system would see Rosado bounced from the bench.
