Pollution finding repeal: Letters – Latest News
The Issue: Miranda Devine discussing advantages of the EPA rescinding its 2009 ‘endangerment’ finding.
Miranda Devine argues that burning more coal will make the world a higher place, quoting President Trump and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin as justification (“End of eco hoax is a world better,” Feb. 12).
She they usually scorn the info offered to us by meteorologists who proceed to warn us that world climate change must be addressed now to stop the worst results on all of us.
While consultants can disagree in regards to the best path ahead, climate-change denial in 2026 will not be a path ahead.
Bill Beckett
Watertown, Mass.
Finally the climate hoax is lifeless. Hopefully the structure of snake oil salesman Al Gore will slither away. The solely “green” climate change was the colour of money these climate zealots scammed from America and the world.
Thomas De Julio
Delray Beach, Fla.
I’m skeptical of the declare that revoking the EPA’s 2009 “endangerment” finding will save new-car consumers $2,400 per vehicle.
That determine relies on the EPA’s biased model and fully ignores the hundreds of {dollars} in fuel financial savings over the lifetime of more fuel-efficient automobiles.
What’s actually troubling is that in failing to steer the auto industry towards electrification, whereas the remainder of the civilized world make the strategic shift to electric automobiles, home automakers could also be rotting away, churning out out of date gasoline-powered vehicles and vehicles the world outdoors the United States doesn’t need.
Frederick Hewett
Cambridge, Mass.
Bravo and kudos to each Trump and Zeldin for repealing the Obama-era “endangerment” finding that may decrease car prices by $2,400 per car.
President Trump has long mentioned that almost all every part in regards to the “environmental cause” is a rip-off, and I imagine him.
With each deregulation transfer he makes, he makes life more reasonably priced and fewer aggravating for the average American household.
Eugene Dunn
Glen Burnie, Md.
All temperatures around the globe show very clearly that our planet is warming at an accelerated tempo. Devine ought to stop following the unscientific principle that this unhappy actuality is a “hoax.”
Sevi Avigdor
Rumson, NJ
The Issue: Attorney General Pam Bondi’s testimony at a heated House Judiciary Committee listening to.
If I had been a member of the House Judiciary Committee, I might have requested Attorney General Pam Bondi a sequence of simple questions — nearly all of which require nothing more than a yes-or-no reply (“Bondi slams ‘loser’ Dems,” Feb. 12).
Did she learn the president’s Sept. 20, 2025 Truth Social post directing the Justice Department to prosecute particular political figures? Before then, had DOJ been planning to pursue these prosecutions? Such questions go to the center of prosecutorial independence and the separation of powers.
Oversight will not be theater. It is Congress’s constitutional accountability. Clear questions create a public document that may strengthen confidence in our establishments or expose weaknesses.
Denny Freidenrich
Laguna Beach, Calif.
If there was ever a query in regards to the {qualifications} of the president’s Cabinet picks, it was soundly answered when Pam Bondi testified earlier than the House Judiciary Committee.
Once you get previous her boastful demeanor and clear makes an attempt at dodging and weaving round undesirable questions, one shortly realizes that Pam Bondi’s not solely unqualified to go up the Justice Department, however is just one other lapdog within the White House kennel.
Bob Ory
Chicago, Ill.
Want to weigh in on right now’s tales? Send your ideas (alongside along with your full title and metropolis of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters are subject to modifying for readability, size, accuracy, and magnificence.
