Gavin Newsom’s Prop. 50 is as racist as – Latest News
Gavin Newsom celebrated final yr when Proposition 50 handed, gerrymandering California’s congressional map to favor Democrats. But the new California map ought to be struck down by the courts for a similar cause the US Supreme Court just lately blocked Louisiana’s map: Both have been drawn utilizing race, in violation of the US Constitution.
The Supreme Court doomed the Louisiana congressional map in Louisiana v. Callais as a result of legislators in Baton Rouge had been express: They needed to create a congressional seat particularly to elect a black consultant to Congress.
Legislators in Sacramento have been even more express about their racial function. Legislator after legislator spoke brazenly about their aim of creating “black districts” and (*50*) As in Louisiana, they garbled the Voting Rights Act, saying it mandated “voters of color be placed in districts” to elect racial minorities.
Gavin Newsom celebrated final yr when Proposition 50 handed, gerrymandering California’s congressional map to favor Democrats. Anadolu by way of Getty Images
The Voting Rights Act does no such factor. Especially after the Supreme Court struck down the Louisiana congressional map, race can’t play a half in legislative line drawing.
In California, time and again and over, legislators boasted about racial retribution for redistricting efforts in Texas and different crimson states. Assemblyman Isaac Bryan, for one instance, complained that a “black voter in Texas is worth one-fifth of the representation of a white voter in Texas. I did say three-fifths.”
All of this racially saturated rhetoric was used to push a congressional map that may wipe out 5 Republican seats in Congress. Partisanship might need been the end result, however the intent was to allocate energy on the premise of race.
Sign up for the California Morning Report e-newsletter
California’s prime information, sports activities and leisure delivered to your inbox daily.
Thanks for signing up!
The fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution makes that unconstitutional.
This week, a three-judge federal panel in Los Angeles will hear arguments from California and the Democratic Party that each one of this is permissible habits by a legislature. They declare partisanship was the intent of the California congressional maps permitted in Prop. 50, regardless of the caustic racial rhetoric during the legislative debates.
The fifteenth Amendment is a not often used provision, largely as a result of legislatures so not often show such open racial goals with such racially express language.
A draft of the California Proposition 50 redistricting map exhibits congressional districts. Redistricting Partners California Congressional
Voters turned out to vote on Prop 50 on Tuesday, November 4, 2025, within the Pacific Palisades district. Andy Johnstone for NewYorkPost
Ironically, California refused to ratify the fifteenth Amendment after the Civil War. In 1870, Gov. Henry Haight instructed the Democrat-controlled Legislature to reject the modification’s prohibitions on denying the franchise primarily based on race. The occasion’s state central committee circulated leaflets on the time, questioning if “Negroes and Chinamen” ought to vote.
It wasn’t till 1959 that California lastly ratified the fifteenth Amendment, righting an outdated incorrect.
California is now arguing that as a result of the voters permitted the congressional maps, the state ought to get a cross on all of the racial rhetoric that featured within the legislative debates.
This is a harmful ask, far worse than something that a crimson state is accused of doing in redistricting.
An aerial view of the California State Capitol on Aug. 19, 2025, in Sacramento, California. Getty Images
“How many bubbles are in a bar of soap?” That’s what election officers requested black residents after they needed to register to vote within the Jim Crow south. The Supreme Court struck down these character assessments. Other states like Oklahoma had grandfather clauses, which prohibited registration to vote until your grandfather had additionally been registered. Again, these have been struck down by the Supreme Court.
California’s harmful place is that voters could absolve a racially motivated law if it merely passes a referendum. That’s corrosive and outrageous to our constitutional order. The majority was purposefully disconnected with the safety of elementary rights.
Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during an election evening gathering after California voters permitted Proposition 50, a measure that can change the state’s present congressional district map with new, legislature-drawn traces from 2026 via 2030. Getty Images
America should get previous this historical past.
The 15h Amendment and Voting Rights Act prohibit governments from allocating energy on the premise of race. The Supreme Court in Callais took off the desk any use of race in any respect in line drawing besides to treatment a particular Voting Rights Act violation.
If race motivated legislatures in any method, the next map is unconstitutional.
Allocating energy utilizing race is depraved. We bought the fifteenth Amendment with horrifying quantities of blood and carnage within the Civil War.
Our constitutional order has no place for legislatures drawing legislative maps brazenly for racial functions, whether or not in Baton Rouge or Sacramento.
J. Christian Adams is a commissioner on the United States Commission on Civil Rights and the president and common counsel for the Public Interest Legal Foundation.
Download The California Post App, observe us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters
California Post News: Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, YouTube, WhatsApp, LinkedIn
California Post Sports Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X
California Post Opinion
California Post Newsletters: Sign up right here!
California Post App: Download right here!
Home supply: Sign up right here!
Page Six Hollywood: Sign up right here!
