What’s behind the Trump-Greenland crisis — and – Latest News
How did the Western Alliance come to a crisis over Greenland, of all locations — and, more important, how can it finish productively?
President Donald Trump has discovered maybe too nicely that Europe’s political elites — the present governments in Britian and France, the dominate forces in the European Union and the left-leaning institutions throughout the continent — received’t do a damned factor on the subject of laborious energy except their noses are rubbed in the need.
It took him almost a decade of threatening to desert NATO to get most member nations to start out ponying up for protection at something like needed ranges.
It took Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to make them even suppose of reconsidering their Moscow-dependent (and economically suicidal) power insurance policies — don’t neglect how the Germans actually laughed off Trump’s 2018 UN warning of the utter foolishness of changing into “totally dependent on Russian energy.”
Even now, they’re persevering with to sell out their nations to China on a host of fronts.
And they (in addition to America’s left-leaning political and coverage elites) have been totally oblivious to Beijing and Moscow’s buildup of affect in Greenland — which is of big strategic significance in controlling the Artic and North Atlantic, in space-related protection points, and in the competitors to secure entry to rare-earth minerals key to high-tech advances.
More From Post Editorial Board
It’s thus comprehensible that he’s come to suppose the solely sure strategy to secure the island for very important US pursuits is for it to turn out to be an American territory: Whatever guarantees the Europeans make now, they could quietly reneg on simply a few years later — and some future Democrat in the White House would possibly let it cross.
Don’t neglect how readily the Europeans and President Barack Obama acquiesced to Vladimir Putin’s first invasion of Ukraine, seizing Crimea and different territories in the east in 2014. (Again: The Germans laughed at Trump 4 years after that.)
And no matter that Denmark’s declare to Greenland rests on the ur-colonialist exploits of Erik the Red a millennium in the past.
Get opinions and commentary from our columnists
Subscribe to our each day Post Opinion e-newsletter!
Thanks for signing up!
None of this makes Trump’s discuss of invasion and imposition of tariffs smart: It’s plainly gotten many European backs up — livid at the reminders of how impotent they’ve chosen to turn out to be.
Left-wing elected leaders, in the meantime, see how their Canadian comrades ju-jitsued public resentment of Trumpian bombast to win yet one more election final yr regardless of the decade-long stagnation produced by Justin Trudeau.
Most of their media already routinely paint him as a fascist buffoon day in and time out; his apocalyptic-seeming discuss on Greenland performs proper into that lazy narrative, which helps secure the elites’ continued energy.
Yet the reality stays: Nothing is more suicidal for Europe now than to permit ever-more investment and financial control from China, which is able to fortunately flip the continent into a de-facto satrapy by taking part in to its elites’ self-regarding delusions till it’s too late.
What’s needed now’s for Washington and Europe to cut some deal, for instance recognition of US predominance in Greenland in exchange for extension of the Golden Dome protection system to cowl all EU territory, or maybe a share in the mining earnings over 50 years.
Let the Europeans save face and strengthen the alliance whereas securing Greenland, in different phrases.
It needn’t middle on Golden Dome or mining, of course: The level is that leaders of allied nations ought to be placing their own nations’ best pursuits first, and discovering a win-win compromise — not posturing for some trivial short-term win which means long-term victory for the enemies of freedom.
